Re: 1.6 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla

2020-09-25 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
This list is probably the correct one for you to discuss it on because I'm not aware of anything else that is really introductory. have you looked at resources like postmaster.aol.com and Google's postmaster resources? AOL really led the charge on email hygiene and putting the kibosh on spammers a

Re: 1.6 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla

2020-09-25 Thread RW
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:31:14 -0500 Jerry Malcolm wrote: > On 9/24/2020 8:17 AM, RW wrote: > > In your list emails you are DKIM signing Message-Id and sending > > directly from AWS. If you are doing the same thing with SES, then > > obviously that would break DKIM. > > > > OTOH if you aren't signi

Re: 1.6 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla

2020-09-25 Thread Jerry Malcolm
On 9/24/2020 8:17 AM, RW wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:47:23 -0500 Jerry Malcolm wrote: But gmail, outlook, and a bunch of other MTAs won't accept it and bounce it back (with no reason attached).  I'm hosting on AWS.  So the recommendation was to proxy my outbound mail through AWS's SES server

Re: SpamAssassin DKIM with Virtual Hosting

2020-09-25 Thread Jerry Malcolm
Bob... wow.  I really appreciate the analysis.  This is (or will be as soon as dig into everything you've explained) incredibly useful.  Thank you so much. Jerry On 9/24/2020 8:23 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Jerry Malcolm wrote: I have a question about how SA's DKIM rules apply to virtual hosting.

Re: SpamAssassin DKIM with Virtual Hosting

2020-09-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Or is there some criteria to determine which domain name > should have the DKIM signature? Is there a penalty score if one or > the other is missing? It's doesn't make much difference, unless there's a whitelist involved. On 24.09.20 08:54, Alan Hodgson wrote: If you publish a DMARC record,