On 01 Jul 2020, at 14:20, Aner Perez wrote:
> we have the spam threshold set very low (2.4)
This is a terrible idea and exposes a fundamental misunderstanding of how SA
works.
If SA scores an email as 3.3 then the message is not considered spam by SA. If
you ignore this and mark it as sam anyw
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> I realize this isn't really a welcome solution per the original note
> but until the legitimate use of those TLDs grows the rules punishing
> them do have value.
There ought to be delist version of enlist_addrlist though.
