On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:35:18 -0700
@lbutlr wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2020, at 07:25, RW wrote:
> > It's the first match on _DOMAIN_, it stands out as being a
> > definition, and it says in simple unambiguous language where the
> > value comes from.
>
> If the OP could look up the domain in the sql
Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now spamc
is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides the point, since
whatever way spamc is called, it can only specify one -u param as the
username. However, the WIKI and Docs version of t
On 18 Feb 2020, at 07:25, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:54:22 -0700 @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On 18 Feb 2020, at 05:30, RW wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100 Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
spamc is invoked th
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:54:22 -0700
@lbutlr wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2020, at 05:30, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100 Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
> >> I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
> >> spamc is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides
On 18 Feb 2020, at 05:30, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100 Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
>> I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
>> spamc is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides the
>> point, since whatever way spamc is called, it can onl
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100
Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
> I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
> spamc is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides the
> point, since whatever way spamc is called, it can only specify one -u
> param as the username.
