On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:15:37 -0500
AJ Weber wrote:
> Just looking at a phishing email I received and at first glance I
> wasn't sure how SA (or more-specifically my SA install/configuration)
> didn't score this as spam.
>
> Looks like I have a whitelist setup for alerts from comcast (probably
> a
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
>
>
> Messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
> have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
> message I received.
Hi, ezmlm,
Yes, we have trained our Spamassassin to block
Just looking at a phishing email I received and at first glance I wasn't
sure how SA (or more-specifically my SA install/configuration) didn't
score this as spam.
Looks like I have a whitelist setup for alerts from comcast (probably a
bad idea, but let's address that separately).
The followi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 05:41:53PM +, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:07:34 -0500
> Sean Hennessey wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to whitelist a domain for the URI_HEX check like you
> > can with the uridnsbl_skip_domain directive?
>
> No.
>
> It currently only scores 0.1, which isn't worth
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:07:34 -0500
Sean Hennessey wrote:
> Is it possible to whitelist a domain for the URI_HEX check like you
> can with the uridnsbl_skip_domain directive?
No.
It currently only scores 0.1, which isn't worth the trouble of
individual exceptions. If you are seeing anything else
Is it possible to whitelist a domain for the URI_HEX check like you can
with the uridnsbl_skip_domain directive?
Linux (Debian/Ubuntu) with 3.3.1 used for testing.
