Re: Bitcoin ransom mail

2019-12-10 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 12/11/19 6:21 AM, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote: > Hi PFA... > > On 12/11/2019 12:36 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: >> On 12/10/19 7:49 PM, Michael Storz wrote: >> [...] >>> My copy hit >>> >>> BODY_SINGLE_WORD=1.347, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=1.172, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79 >>> >>> not enough to mark it as spammy. >

Re: SA memory (Re: ".*" in body rules)

2019-12-10 Thread RW
> hmmm, the machine has 4G of RAM and SA now takes 4.5. > The check rund out of time but produces ~450K debug file. > > This is where it hangs: > > Dec 10 17:43:51.727 [9721] dbg: bayes: tokenized header: 211 tokens What are the full counts if you put it through 'grep tokenized'

Re: Bitcoin ransom mail

2019-12-10 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 12/10/19 7:49 PM, Michael Storz wrote: [...] > My copy hit > > BODY_SINGLE_WORD=1.347, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=1.172, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79 > > not enough to mark it as spammy. > > could you share a spample (as a pastebin uri or in private) ? Giovanni

Re: Bitcoin ransom mail

2019-12-10 Thread Michael Storz
Am 2019-12-10 19:03, schrieb Joseph Brennan: A user here reported a new twist on the bitcoin ransom mail. New to me, anyway. From: Casper Mitten Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 10:00 PM The Subject was a single word, supposedly a password. The message was a jpg picture of text. Although it was

Bitcoin ransom mail

2019-12-10 Thread Joseph Brennan
A user here reported a new twist on the bitcoin ransom mail. New to me, anyway. From: Casper Mitten Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 10:00 PM The Subject was a single word, supposedly a password. The message was a jpg picture of text. Although it was in English, many vowels were accented special c

Re: SA memory (Re: ".*" in body rules)

2019-12-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:54:00AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I'm afraid I can't provide clients' file. I can only repeat: - the mail is 20424329 bytes - the mail contains single uuencoded .rar file inline. -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 14818832 Dec 9 10:50 'redacted.rar' I have tried to r

Re: txrep duplicated key with postgresql

2019-12-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2019-12-09 22:52, Daniel J. Luke wrote: I uploaded a patch for postgresql on https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7218 a while ago - but I haven't had time to clean it up into something that should be included into a release. added this patch, seem to solve it It might serve