Re: Spamassassin reporting

2019-12-04 Thread Chris Pollock
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 11:22 -0500, Dave Goodrich wrote: > Good morning, > > Many years ago, in previous jobs, I used several scripts to report > spam statistics daily. Some I wrote, some I downloaded. I need to > create some reporting on our current zimbra/postfix/spamassassin > server. The suppli

Re: Spamassassin reporting

2019-12-04 Thread Chris Pollock
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 11:22 -0500, Dave Goodrich wrote: > Good morning, > > Many years ago, in previous jobs, I used several scripts to report > spam statistics daily. Some I wrote, some I downloaded. I need to > create some reporting on our current zimbra/postfix/spamassassin > server. The suppli

Re: Custom rule help

2019-12-04 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 14:22 -0800, Chris Mulcahy wrote: > Actually, I want it to score if there ISN’T a match. If I get an email > addressed to slashdot@example.com from an address that isn’t from > slashdot, it’s likely spam. > > Currently, I am doing like you mentioned with a bunch of indivi

Re: Custom rule help

2019-12-04 Thread Chris Mulcahy
From: Martin Gregorie Reply: mar...@gregorie.org Date: December 4, 2019 at 4:12:22 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom rule help On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 12:40 -0800, Chris Mulcahy wrote: > I want a rule that scores if “sitename” is not in the From: line. If > they send fr

Re: Custom rule help

2019-12-04 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 12:40 -0800, Chris Mulcahy wrote: > I want a rule that scores if “sitename” is not in the From: line. If > they send from i...@sitename.com, I’ll assume it’s legit. If sitename > does not exist, I’ll tick up the score a bit. I have done this for > some specific domains but th

Re: bayes_auto_learn_on_error

2019-12-04 Thread RW
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:08 +0100 Philipp Ewald wrote: > Hi guys, > > autolearning will be performed only when a bayes classifier had a > different opinion from what the autolearner is now trying to teach it > > i thought bayes only learn on error like: > score > 5 && Bayes_00 Sort of, it's mo

Custom rule help

2019-12-04 Thread Chris Mulcahy
Hi. I’m relatively new to complex custom rules. I have plenty of simple and some multi-condition rules but need something custom. My approach to using my domain name is bad but I started it in the 90s so… I have some sites where I gave them my email address as “ sitename@mydomain.com” so I

Re: Spamassassin reporting

2019-12-04 Thread MAILIST
> Many years ago, in previous jobs, I used several scripts to report spam > statistics daily. Some I wrote, some I downloaded. I need to create some > reporting on our current zimbra/postfix/spamassassin server. The supplied > stats are pretty for managers if you have Flash, but not useful. There

Re: Spamassassin reporting

2019-12-04 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 12/4/19 5:22 PM, Dave Goodrich wrote: > Good morning, > > Many years ago, in previous jobs, I used several scripts to report spam > statistics daily. Some I wrote, some I downloaded. I need to create some > reporting on our current zimbra/postfix/spamassassin server. The supplied > stats are

Re: Spamassassin reporting

2019-12-04 Thread Riccardo Alfieri
On 04/12/19 17:22, Dave Goodrich wrote: Can anyone recommend a ready to run OSS script, or set of scripts, for basic maillog stats concerning Spam? Just thought I would ask before I wrote something. Internet searching is not turning up anything for me. Did you take a look at https://cwiki.a

bayes_auto_learn_on_error

2019-12-04 Thread Philipp Ewald
Hi guys, autolearning will be performed only when a bayes classifier had a different opinion from what the autolearner is now trying to teach it i thought bayes only learn on error like: score > 5 && Bayes_00 or score < -1 && bayes_99 (+bayes_999) i dont get it: score=-1.9 tagged_above=-

Spamassassin reporting

2019-12-04 Thread Dave Goodrich
Good morning, Many years ago, in previous jobs, I used several scripts to report spam statistics daily. Some I wrote, some I downloaded. I need to create some reporting on our current zimbra/postfix/spamassassin server. The supplied stats are pretty for managers if you have Flash, but not usefu

Re: False positives due to __BITCOIN_ID

2019-12-04 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:59:42AM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2019-12-03 20:15, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:05:10 -0500 > > Mark London wrote: > > > >> It seems to me that the rule for detecting a BITCOIN in an email, is > >> incorrect. See below: > >> > >> body __BITCOIN_ID /\b(

Re: False positives due to __BITCOIN_ID

2019-12-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2019-12-03 20:15, RW wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:05:10 -0500 Mark London wrote: It seems to me that the rule for detecting a BITCOIN in an email, is incorrect. See below: body __BITCOIN_ID /\b(? It doesn't, but spammers have started splitting them up to evade detections. if clients be