On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 06:23:32AM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 05:49, Bill Cole <[1]
> sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
>
> On 14 Nov 2019, at 0:14, Amir Caspi wrote:
>
> > DMARC_REJECT
>
> Is not the name of any rule currently distribut
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 05:49, Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2019, at 0:14, Amir Caspi wrote:
>
> > DMARC_REJECT
>
> Is not the name of any rule currently distributed by the Apache
> SpamAssassin project...
>
This comes from an update to KAM.cf in the last
On 14 Nov 2019, at 0:14, Amir Caspi wrote:
DMARC_REJECT
Is not the name of any rule currently distributed by the Apache
SpamAssassin project...
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hi
Hi all,
Over the past few weeks I've been getting occasional DMARC_REJECT hits
on valid mail (e.g., from family, from valid bank emails, etc.). It's unclear
why this is happening since the SA report doesn't really give any information.
The score on DMARC_REJECT is +10, which is enough
On 13.11.19 12:01, Linkcheck wrote:
I was rather hoping someone could supply a basic setup that would
allow spamass-milter to run with postfix, which is why I originally
posted so much information.
On 13.11.19 14:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You mention having Mint (Ubuntu 16). Ubuntu
On 11/11/2019 19:23, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i am confused from your first post where you show spamPd and spamD
config files
On 13.11.19 12:01, Linkcheck wrote:
I posted all I could find relating to spamassassin. I missed chroot,
which never occurred to me might be relevant since I've never appl
On 11/11/2019 19:23, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i am confused from your first post where you show spamPd and spamD
config files
I posted all I could find relating to spamassassin. I missed chroot,
which never occurred to me might be relevant since I've never applied it.
spamPd is a smtp proxy th
> "with postfix, you may need to set up milter wocket within its chroot"
Ok, but since I do NOT use chroot which should I set up, bearing in mind
the other milters all run successfully?
My original posting gives my setup AS FAR AS I CAN DISCOVER IT.
Presumably something in it is incorrect or
On 11/11/2019 19:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
because it's common sense
Sorry, but that is NOT an explanation.
when postfix is configured to a unix socket which is a path it needs to
live within the chroot postfix is using
I am not using chroot
then why did you respond at all to something talki
