On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:45:56 +0100
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 October 2019 at 20:23:37, RW wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:09:11 -0400
> >
> > Mark London wrote:
> > > Is PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT new? I see it hitting real emails
> > > here, but hitting no spam emails. Than
On Wednesday 30 October 2019 at 20:23:37, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:09:11 -0400
>
> Mark London wrote:
> > Is PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT new? I see it hitting real emails
> > here, but hitting no spam emails. Thanks.
>
> It's one of several rules based on __PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL, whi
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:09:11 -0400
Mark London wrote:
> Is PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT new? I see it hitting real emails
> here, but hitting no spam emails. Thanks.
It's one of several rules based on __PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL, which is
looking for To headers that look like this:
To: foo
A pr
Is PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT new? I see it hitting real emails here, but
hitting no spam emails. Thanks.
- Mark
Sent from my iPhone
