On 30 Aug 2019, at 16:11, Jerry Martinez wrote:
I have noticed an unusually high amount of my HTML emails are being
tagged
as spam. The offending rule appears to be:
ScanSA rules applied: (1.8) ...NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST=1.82
This is an overly simplistic analysis.
No single rule with a score of
On 30 Aug 2019, at 16:48, Jerry Martinez wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
"my HTML emails" refers to email that I am sending through MailChimp.
For
the receiving end (I am also a recipient of those emails), we use
DuoCircle
as our email gateway which then forwards emails to our internal email
se
Thanks for the reply.
"my HTML emails" refers to email that I am sending through MailChimp. For
the receiving end (I am also a recipient of those emails), we use DuoCircle
as our email gateway which then forwards emails to our internal email server
(hMailServer). I have confirmed that the emails a
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:11:21 -0400
Jerry Martinez wrote:
> I have noticed an unusually high amount of my HTML emails are being
> tagged as spam. The offending rule appears to be:
>
> ScanSA rules applied: (1.8) ...NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST=1.82
Note the NORDNS part which means 'no reverse DNS'; very l
I have noticed an unusually high amount of my HTML emails are being tagged
as spam. The offending rule appears to be:
ScanSA rules applied: (1.8) ...NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST=1.82
I gather the NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST rule is being triggered by the PREHEADER
that is coded within the HTML email. Preheaders a
On 30 Aug 2019, at 12:32, @lbutlr wrote:
> That is probably my error then. I remove the -Q flag manually and didn’t
> check -u since there is a scan user on the system.
Found the problem, it wasn’t spam assassin at all, it was an old crontab script
that someone how was re-enabled. removed it fr
On 30 Aug 2019, at 11:49, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:58:30 -0600
> @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> I have a lot of processes that look like this:
>>
>> root 48359 100.0 1.4 55984 47680 - R17:53 989:39.50
>> /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/sa-learn --spam -u vscan
> ...
>>
On 30 Aug 2019, at 11:49, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:58:30 -0600
> @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> I have a lot of processes that look like this:
>>
>> root 48359 100.0 1.4 55984 47680 - R17:53 989:39.50
>> /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/sa-learn --spam -u vscan
> ...
>>
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:58:30 -0600
@lbutlr wrote:
> I have a lot of processes that look like this:
>
> root 48359 100.0 1.4 55984 47680 - R17:53 989:39.50
> /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/sa-learn --spam -u vscan
...
> /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_toks Aug 30 1
I have a lot of processes that look like this:
root 48359 100.0 1.4 55984 47680 - R17:53 989:39.50
/usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/sa-learn --spam -u vscan
/usr/local/virtual/kr...@kreme.com/Maildir/.Junk/cur/15670…
/usr/local/virtual/kr...@kreme.com/Maildir/.Junk/cu
On 29 Aug 2019, at 20:13, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Samy Ascha wrote:
>
>> Thx a lot for that extra info. That was enough to find the match here:
>>
>> Aug 29 17:11:59.202 [10745] dbg: rules: ran body rule __DRUGS_ERECTILE3
>> ==> got hit: " C I A L I S "
>>
>> Face-palm
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Samy Ascha wrote:
Today, I encountered, for the first time, an issue with scanning
an email that is composed in Spanish.
It is hitting a fuzzy match somewhere in the DRUGS_ERECTILE and
DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU rules matches.
I'm generally looking for a way to manipulate these
12 matches
Mail list logo
