Re: PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:11:58 +0100 Paul Stead wrote: Your headers had: X-Spam-Status: ... PDS_NO_HELO_DNS ... Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E26387

Re: PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

I believe this is because AskDNS requests don't get ignored on masscheck regardless of tflags - I've removed the rule from sandbox and will investigate this tentacle of the masscheck Paul

Re: PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:40:31AM -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Henrik K wrote: > > >On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 06:04:39PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > >>On 7/10/19 5:54 PM, Mark London wrote: > >>>I'm sorry for not using bugzilla, but the new rule for PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is > >>>

Re: PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Henrik K wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 06:04:39PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 7/10/19 5:54 PM, Mark London wrote: I'm sorry for not using bugzilla, but the new rule for PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is mostly hittng real emails at my site 1168 real emails versus 219 spam mls.  

Re: PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 06:04:39PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > On 7/10/19 5:54 PM, Mark London wrote: > > I'm sorry for not using bugzilla, but the new rule for PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is > > mostly hittng real emails at my site 1168 real emails versus 219 spam mls.   > > Luckily, the score is not hi

Re: PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 7/10/19 5:54 PM, Mark London wrote: I'm sorry for not using bugzilla, but the new rule for PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is mostly hittng real emails at my site 1168 real emails versus 219 spam mls.   Luckily, the score is not high, to be making any difference

Re: PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

On 7/10/19 5:54 PM, Mark London wrote: > I'm sorry for not using bugzilla, but the new rule for PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is > mostly hittng real emails at my site 1168 real emails versus 219 spam mls.   > Luckily, the score is not high, to be making any difference.   FWIW. - Mark > ruleqa has the same op

PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is not helpful at all.

I'm sorry for not using bugzilla, but the new rule for PDS_NO_HELO_DNS is mostly hittng real emails at my site 1168 real emails versus 219 spam mls. Luckily, the score is not high, to be making any difference. FWIW. - Mark