Re: Rule for non-DKIM-signed messages

2019-05-10 Thread Kurt Fitzner
On 2019-05-10 12:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I wanted to comment OP's mail, but since I don't have DKIM set up, I wasn't sure it would pass :-) I actually didn't have DKIM signing set up myself until a couple weeks ago. I had been lazy in setting it for a while, but I had to because

Re: Rule for non-DKIM-signed messages

2019-05-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 5/10/19 1:52 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote: On the contrary, most spam i see is valid DKIM signed...   tons of hacked sites... tons of emails from free trials of big-cheeses... Nevertheless... meta    NO_DKIM_SIGNED    ! DKIM_SIGNED score NO_DKIM_SIGNED        2 describe NO_DKIM_SIGNED

Re: Rule for non-DKIM-signed messages

2019-05-10 Thread David Jones
On 5/10/19 1:52 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > > On the contrary, most spam i see is valid DKIM signed...   tons of > hacked sites... tons of emails from free trials of big-cheeses... > > Nevertheless... > > meta    NO_DKIM_SIGNED    ! DKIM_SIGNED > score NO_DKIM_SIGNED