On 11/26/18 11:10 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 11/26/2018 02:33 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> I think that fear is unfounded
>
> Please don't mistake my laziness as fear. I simply am not motivated enough
> to construct a solution that will harvest outgoing recipient addresses.
>
I do not know i
On 26 Nov 2018, at 15:35, Bill Cole
wrote:
> Yes, spamass-milter is apparently abandonware.
Thank you. I’ll look about for something else, but I *think* I have it working
at this point, other than the one time complaint at startup which it appears I
can live with.
I do appreciate your knowled
I have the following custom rules working pretty well in testing, but
ran into this message with two "Authentication-Results" headers:
Authentication-Results: mx3.webtent.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
header.from=email.monoprice.com
Authentication-Results: mx3.webtent.org;
dkim=fail
On 26 Nov 2018, at 16:16, @lbutlr wrote:
spamass-milter[27557]: Could not retrieve sendmail macro "i"!.
Please add it to confMILTER_MACROS_ENVFROM for better spamassassin
results
(I am not using sendmail, other than postfix’s sendmail
replacement)
See the documentation of the milter_*_m
On 11/26/2018 02:33 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
I think that fear is unfounded
Please don't mistake my laziness as fear. I simply am not motivated
enough to construct a solution that will harvest outgoing recipient
addresses.
I might be interested and motivated enough to (eventually) constr
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 12:38 -0700, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I agree with your logic. But I don't know if I want to organically
> grow the list based on outgoing email recipients. I think I'd rather
> use the contents of address books. (Obviously something needs to get
> said address book data from
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:58:08 +0100
Alex Woick wrote:
> I cannot believe nobody did some Bayes variant in the past that
> identifies and feeds phrases of 2-4 words into the database instead
> of only single words.
If you want that you can use a suitably configured third-party filter
like Bogofi
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.covisp.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
ad...@covisp.net for details.
Content preview: O
On 11/26/2018 06:08 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Write yourself a plugin which looks up a database table of known
addresses. Thats not hard if you know a bit of Perl,
ACK
though the list of incoming addresses sounds too simplistic to be much
use: how would it distinguish between spammers and no
Hi,
I'm subscribed to this long-standing bug and saw it had an update
today basically saying that it's still broken in 3.4.2:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7211
And I agree, it is still broken in 3.4.2. An IPv6 address will be
looked up in a DNS list that contains IPv4 a
On 26 Nov 2018, at 9:17, @lbutlr wrote:
[...]
I have spamass-milter setup and running, and it is tagging mail, but I
am seeing various readme and setup guides that set various things in
rc.conf:spamass_milter_localflags. Trouble is, these settings seem to
vary wildly.
Yes, local details of m
In the last weeks I tried to create custom rules for several spam not
catched (mostly german), and it's always the same:
- identify catchy phrases that (hopefully) only appear in that kind of spam
- make indirect rules for the catchy phrases
- make meta rules for combining a certain amount of cat
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
=_5BFC0066.FF7B25D3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.covisp.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible sp
On 26 Nov 2018, at 06:42, David Gibbs wrote:
> On 11/21/2018 12:56 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>> While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost
>> because of the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck
>> unexpectedly asking for a confirmation, but still I’d like to avoid
>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 01:08:04PM +, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> Instead, consider populating the database with addresses that your
> users have sent mail to because by and large these will not be
> spammers.
If using postfix, one could use my postpals tool for this too..
http://mailfud.org/p
On 11/21/2018 12:56 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost
because of the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck
unexpectedly asking for a confirmation, but still I’d like to avoid
this happening again.
Maybe I'm missing something, but
On Sun, 2018-11-25 at 20:54 -0700, Grant Taylor wrote:
> Ultimately I'd like to have a (hashed) list addresses that I
> recognize and add (0.1?) to the spam score for each unknown address.
>
Write yourself a plugin which looks up a database table of known
addresses. Thats not hard if you know a bi
17 matches
Mail list logo
