Hi Daniele,
there is a virtal system, no problem with mem.
I hope i found the fail, i delete or rename rules.body_0/rules.body_neg100 and
tested again, then there is no fail.
Best regards
Ronny
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daniele Duca
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. September 2018 16:24
A
Hi Kevin,
sry for my late answer.
I tested yesterday:
su -c 'spamassassin --lint -D' -l amavis
Sep 30 20:00:17.369 [28262] dbg: rules: compiled meta tests
Sep 30 20:00:17.370 [28262] dbg: check: running tests for priority: 0
Sep 30 20:00:17.370 [28262] dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; sc
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 08:55:13PM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 21:13 +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 06:44:07PM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > >
> > > Sep 30 18:06:54.602 [18545] warn: config: Strange rule token: 1.5
> >
> > According to code this c
Possibly related to https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7627
which says you have a rule issue to. Post the rule you are working on
otherwise look for a syntax error.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www
On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 21:13 +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 06:44:07PM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >
> > Sep 30 18:06:54.602 [18545] warn: config: Strange rule token: 1.5
>
> According to code this can only be seen with meta rules. So check if
> you have "meta FOOBAR 1.5" so
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 06:44:07PM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> Sep 30 18:06:54.602 [18545] warn: config: Strange rule token: 1.5
According to code this can only be seen with meta rules. So check if you
have "meta FOOBAR 1.5" somewhere.
I was just now link checking a modified local rule (SA 3.4.2 on Fedora
28, fully patched as on last Friday night (28Sep2018) when I got the
error:
Sep 30 18:06:54.602 [18545] warn: config: Strange rule token: 1.5
Sep 30 18:06:55.316 [18545] warn: lint: 1 issues detected, please rerun
with debug en
Hi all, I'm pretty sure this is a problem on their side, but can
anyone else confirm ixhash is having a problem? Anyone else using the
iXhash plugin? Their site http://www.ixhash.net/ also appears to be
down.
30-Sep-2018 12:03:24.249 query-errors: client @0x7ff3f01a43d0
68.195.193.45#44607
(230fe4