And in addition...
On 17 Jul 2018, at 20:00 (-0400), Chip M. wrote:
> 3. Pure numeric TLDs appear to be non existent (so far!)
I expect that this will hold true for a long time.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses
On 17 Jul 2018, at 20:00 (-0400), Chip M. wrote:
There's a new morph of the porn extortion campaign, with some
interesting under-the-hood changes.
The previous ones were always:
- two "quoted-printable" parts (plain text, html)
- "From" Outlook accounts
- sent via Outlook/Hotmail/MS IPs (no oth
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2018, Chip M. wrote:
Here's the SA test stats for 13 of this new morph:
FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA 1
HTML_MESSAGE 13
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 13
LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT 13
MIME_BASE64_TEXT9
MIME_HTML_O
On Tue, 18 Jul 2018, Chip M. wrote:
Here's the SA test stats for 13 of this new morph:
FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA 1
HTML_MESSAGE 13
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 13
LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT 13
MIME_BASE64_TEXT9
MIME_HTML_ONLY 13
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
On Tue, 18 Jul 2018, Chip M. wrote:
Here's the SA test stats for 13 of this new morph:
FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA 1
HTML_MESSAGE 13
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 13
LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT 13
MIME_BASE64_TEXT9
MIME_HTML_ONLY 13
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
There's a new morph of the porn extortion campaign, with some
interesting under-the-hood changes.
The previous ones were always:
- two "quoted-printable" parts (plain text, html)
- "From" Outlook accounts
- sent via Outlook/Hotmail/MS IPs (no other IPs in route)
- passed both DKIM and SPF
The new
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:49:16 +1200
Michael Hallager (personal) wrote:
> On 2018-07-18 01:11, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > Txrep does not have autocleaning support, bayes have it if
> > auto_bayes_expire is set.
> > Giovanni
>
> I have looked into this here:
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full
On 2018-07-18 01:11, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Txrep does not have autocleaning support, bayes have it if
auto_bayes_expire is set.
Giovanni
I have looked into this here:
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html#expiration
Our Bayes DB is over 5Gb which seems at odds with the
On 2018-07-18 01:11, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Txrep does not have autocleaning support, bayes have it if
auto_bayes_expire is set.
Giovanni
Hi Giovanni,
I have looked into this here:
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html#expiration
Our Bayes DB is over 5Gb which seems at
On 2018-07-18 00:35, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
What are you using in a db?
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Hi Kevin,
awl, bayes_* and userpref.
Thanks,
Michael
I'll defer that question to Alex Broens. He can do it more justice than I
ever could. AXB?
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, micah anderso
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
> I think Bayes should be in redis though not SQL.
Curious to know why you think that?
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2018-07-17 18:40:
RW is right. Don't use auto_bayes_expire use sa-learn --force-expire
in a cron. It's another bayes option I've wondered "why does this
exist"?
it was usefull to keep all bayes digest before ?
my bayes_seen is bigger then my bayes_digest
auto_baye
RW is right. Don't use auto_bayes_expire use sa-learn --force-expire in a
cron. It's another bayes option I've wondered "why does this exist"?
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.79
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:11:10 +0200
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> Txrep does not have autocleaning support, bayes have it
It's not complete as there is no way of ageing-out the entries that
record whether a particular email was trained as spam or ham.
> if auto_bayes_expire is set.
It's safer to tu
Txrep does not have autocleaning support, bayes have it if auto_bayes_expire is
set.
Giovanni
On 07/17/18 14:35, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> To me, no, it doesn't.
>
> For example, I clean out txrep stuff with crons like this -e 'DELETE FROM
> txrep WHERE last_hit <= (now() - INTERVAL 90 day);'
To me, no, it doesn't.
For example, I clean out txrep stuff with crons like this -e 'DELETE FROM
txrep WHERE last_hit <= (now() - INTERVAL 90 day);'
I also don't use autolearning bayes but some people like to cull there
bayes. I think Bayes should be in redis though not SQL.
What are you using
17 matches
Mail list logo