(1)
[root@ns1 ~]# sudo -H -u amavis bash -c '/usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic'
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 32225 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 440420 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 159
On 05/08/2018 03:47 PM, David Jones wrote:
On 05/08/2018 03:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any special techniques for catching these invoice
phish emails?
https://pastebin.com/raw/TfvhUu0X
I've added a few body rules, and even despite training previous
similar messages as spam, they
On 05/08/2018 03:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any special techniques for catching these invoice phish emails?
https://pastebin.com/raw/TfvhUu0X
I've added a few body rules, and even despite training previous
similar messages as spam, they continue. These emails very closely
resemble
On 05/08/2018 03:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any special techniques for catching these invoice phish emails?
https://pastebin.com/raw/TfvhUu0X
I've added a few body rules, and even despite training previous
similar messages as spam, they continue. These emails very closely
resemble
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any special techniques for catching these invoice phish emails?
https://pastebin.com/raw/TfvhUu0X
I've added a few body rules, and even despite training previous
similar messages as spam, they continue. These emails very closely
resemble leg
Hi,
Does anyone have any special techniques for catching these invoice phish emails?
https://pastebin.com/raw/TfvhUu0X
I've added a few body rules, and even despite training previous
similar messages as spam, they continue. These emails very closely
resemble legitimate email regarding invoices th
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Reio Remma wrote:
On 08.05.2018 22:08, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits
On 08.05.2018 22:08, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits 5
report_safe 0
rewrite_header Subject [
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits 5
report_safe 0
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_le
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits 5
report_safe 0
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_expire 1
# Store bayesian
Rupert Gallagher skrev den 2018-05-08 11:24:
While reading from RIPE below, I recollected numerous cases of spam
from domains without own abuse RR. I then remembered making a mental
note about writing a SA rule for it, and now realise I just forgot
about it.
Is anybody using one such rule alread
Ok there is a deprecated rule, which did not do much, as it just queried a
dnsbl.
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:24, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> While reading from RIPE below, I recollected numerous cases of spam from
> domains without ow
While reading from RIPE below, I recollected numerous cases of spam from
domains without own abuse RR. I then remembered making a mental note about
writing a SA rule for it, and now realise I just forgot about it.
Is anybody using one such rule already?
https://www.ripe.net/support/abuse
13 matches
Mail list logo
