On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Noel Butler wrote:
On 03/03/2018 04:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
[199.127.240.84 listed in iadb.isipp.com]
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF RBL: IADB: Sender publishes SPF
On 03/03/2018 04:40, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote: On 01/03/18 19:50, David Jones
> wrote: On 03/01/2018 12:29 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote: I know I have brought
> up this issue on this list before, and sorry for the persistence, but having
> 7 different rules ad
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 01/03/18 19:50, David Jones wrote:
On 03/01/2018 12:29 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for the
persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the IADB
whitelist still seems
On 2 Mar 2018, at 0:48, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
But why does SA have to expose a rule for each and every code IADB
provides?
So that users can implement their own policies if desired? So that
different rules can have a more granular effect on the inbound email
flow, without this being a simpl
On 03/02/2018 12:54 PM, Daniele Duca wrote:
Hello list,
apologies if this is not directly SA related. "Lately" I've started to
notice that some (not saying names) VPS providers, when offering v6
connectivity, sometimes tends to not follow the best practice of giving
a /64 to their customer, r
On 03/02/2018 02:54 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 01/03/18 19:50, David Jones wrote:
On 03/01/2018 12:29 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry
for the persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for
the IADB whitelist still s
2018-03-02 10:08 GMT-03:00 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> On 02.03.18 09:58, Leandro wrote:
>
>> Hi Danilele! Our DNSBL works with individual /128 IPv6 addresses:
>>
>> http://spfbl.net/en/dnsbl/
>>
>> Even if the provider is offering less then /64 to customers, our DNSBL can
>> list IPv6 of each one.
On 02.03.18 09:58, Leandro wrote:
Hi Danilele! Our DNSBL works with individual /128 IPv6 addresses:
http://spfbl.net/en/dnsbl/
Even if the provider is offering less then /64 to customers, our DNSBL can
list IPv6 of each one.
how/who do you list when spammer starts rotating IPs in assigned /64
Hi Danilele! Our DNSBL works with individual /128 IPv6 addresses:
http://spfbl.net/en/dnsbl/
Even if the provider is offering less then /64 to customers, our DNSBL can
list IPv6 of each one.
But do not use our DNSBL to reject messages. Use only for SA punctuation,
higher points to 127.0.0.2.
Re
Hello list,
apologies if this is not directly SA related. "Lately" I've started to
notice that some (not saying names) VPS providers, when offering v6
connectivity, sometimes tends to not follow the best practice of giving
a /64 to their customer, routing to them much smaller v6 subnets, while
On 01/03/18 19:50, David Jones wrote:
On 03/01/2018 12:29 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for
the persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the
IADB whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
-
On 01/03/18 19:04, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for
the persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the
IADB whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
-0.2
12 matches
Mail list logo
