Good question!
One may write the regex backwards: if it matches "fedex" in the address, but
does not match "FedEx" in the name, then... However, there are many cases where
this will fail or return false positives.
One may say that fedex is a brand name that only fedex can use, so if the
patter
Hi,
I don't think I fully understand how to use the fuzzy rules with a proper regex:
From: "F*e dE x"
That address hardly resembles "Fed Ex", but how general of a rule can
we create and still catch variations such as this?
I thought something like this would work:
headerFUZZY_FEDEX From
On 2018-01-13 09:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 13.01.18 09:35, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i set my local.cf to use MySQL as a bayes store and it seems to work fine
setting ham and spam in the database when a message is flagged. however it has
had no impact on spam received to the inboxes.
On 13.01.18 09:35, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
i set my local.cf to use MySQL as a bayes store and it seems to work
fine setting ham and spam in the database when a message is flagged.
however it has had no impact on spam received to the inboxes. we are
still receiving a large amount of junk ema
On Saturday 13 January 2018 at 09:35:47, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
> i am using CentOS 7, spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64,
> postfix-2.10.1-6.el7.x86_64, with amavisd.
>
> i set my local.cf to use MySQL as a bayes store and it seems to work
> fine setting ham and spam in the database when a messag
i am using CentOS 7, spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64,
postfix-2.10.1-6.el7.x86_64, with amavisd.
i set my local.cf to use MySQL as a bayes store and it seems to work
fine setting ham and spam in the database when a message is flagged.
however it has had no impact on spam received to the inbox
