On 03 Jan 2018, at 04:57, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> while it's "only" recommended that the right part is a domain name, but
> there must be right part.
Yes, there must be a left and a right and an ‘@‘ in-between.
On 03 Jan 2018, at 12:36, Bill Cole
wrote:
> About 1.5% of my personal non-
On 2018-01-03 14:36, Bill Cole wrote:
> I have run an environment where each MTA node in the external gateway
> layer would add a MID with its own FQDN to any message passing through
> missing a MID. Those names could not be resolved in the world at
> large, but they were absolutely valid and guar
On 2 Jan 2018, at 20:39, Alex wrote:
Is it possible to at least enforce that the message-ID has a valid
domain?
Not reliably.
About 1.5% of my personal non-spam email over the past 20 years has had
"localhost" as the right hand side of the MID. This implies a de facto
RFC violation because
On 1 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
On 1 Jan 2018, at 11:41 (-0500), Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
the gross format in RFCs 822,2822 and 5322 describes message-id consisting
of local and domain part, thus is must contain "@".
On 01.01.18 12:17, Bill Cole
On Wednesday 03 January 2018 at 02:39:54, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to at least enforce that the message-ID has a valid domain?
If by "enforce" you mean "require" (in other words, you look at whatever
message-ID the incoming email has, and you decide that if it doesn't contain a
val
