Does This Look Right?

2017-12-04 Thread Colony.three
Looks like it's doing what it's supposed to, but just checking... Dec 5 06:58:26 quantumn postfix/smtpd[51554]: lost connection after AUTH from unknown[110.83.135.178] Dec 5 06:58:26 quantumn postfix/smtpd[51554]: disconnect from unknown[110.83.135.178] ehlo=1 auth=0/1 commands=1/2 Dec 5 06:5

Re: FIlter

2017-12-04 Thread Junk
what i am asking is how to you manage actual IPs of the hosts providing services. What if at some point one of them or more are out of service? D you monitor it so in case some stop providing the services you remove them or replace them? Does send mail provide similar functionality to postscreen

Re: TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP

2017-12-04 Thread RW
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:52:29 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, Joseph Brennan wrote: > > > New rule: TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP > > Old rule, perhaps newly promoted and published. > > > Since TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP is 2.361 and its component RDNS_DYNAMIC is > > 2.639, one gets an even 5.0

Re: FIlter

2017-12-04 Thread Junk
So I wonder if postscreen_dnsbl is enabled is it possible that mail get lost by mistake? Somehow some false positive? How do you maintain the list? > On 12/02/2017 09:09 PM, Junk wrote: >> Is there any list that can be trusted and is publicly available or >> unless you pay nothing is trusted? >>

Re: TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP

2017-12-04 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, Joseph Brennan wrote: New rule: TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP Old rule, perhaps newly promoted and published. Since TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP is 2.361 and its component RDNS_DYNAMIC is 2.639, one gets an even 5.0 score just for sending from ec2-54-225-189-51.compute-1.amazonaws.com without <

Re: TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP

2017-12-04 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:20 -0500, Joseph Brennan wrote: > New rule: TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP > > Since TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP is 2.361 and its component RDNS_DYNAMIC is > 2.639, one gets an even 5.0 score just for sending from ec2-54-225- > 189-51.compute-1.amazonaws.com without < > around the To address. >

TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP

2017-12-04 Thread Joseph Brennan
New rule: TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP Since TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP is 2.361 and its component RDNS_DYNAMIC is 2.639, one gets an even 5.0 score just for sending from ec2-54-225-189-51.compute-1.amazonaws.com without < > around the To address. Should the amazonaws.com hosts not be in RDNS_DYNAMIC? I'm not silly