On 11/25/2017 04:40 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:37:12 -0600
David Jones wrote:
The default SA rules handle Paypal spoofing pretty well with
def_whitelist_from_spf in 60_whitelist_spf.cf.
There are def_whitelist entries for amazon domains too. But these
entries don't handle spoofing.
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:37:12 -0600
David Jones wrote:
> The default SA rules handle Paypal spoofing pretty well with
> def_whitelist_from_spf in 60_whitelist_spf.cf.
There are def_whitelist entries for amazon domains too. But these
entries don't handle spoofing.
> Adding "Paypal" and
> vari
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 14:37 -0600, David Jones wrote:
> With that rule as it stands, an easily spoofed "Amazon
> " would not hit FAKE_AMAZON_FROM. Even if the
> rule specified "@amazon.com," then native DMARC support would be
> needed to block spoofed From: headers for the next amazon.com
> spoof
On 11/25/2017 01:09 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 11:41 -0600, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Thanks so much for all the info. I have installed KAM rules, and
I've
started becoming a ninja writing my own (simple) rules. MUCH
improved
results (amazing when you finally learn what your d
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 11:41 -0600, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> Thanks so much for all the info. I have installed KAM rules, and
> I've
> started becoming a ninja writing my own (simple) rules. MUCH
> improved
> results (amazing when you finally learn what your doing)
>
> I figure before this is
On 11/25/2017 12:20 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Thanks, Dave. Now I'm REALLY glad I didn't try to figure this one out
on my own What you are recommending makes sense. But doubt I'd have
stumbled onto this solution on my own :-)
Jerry
Sure. I totally understand. It takes a bit of expe
On 11/25/2017 12:02 PM, David Jones wrote:
On 11/25/2017 11:41 AM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Thanks so much for all the info. I have installed KAM rules, and
I've started becoming a ninja writing my own (simple) rules. MUCH
improved results (amazing when you finally learn what your doing)
I
On 11/25/2017 11:41 AM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Thanks so much for all the info. I have installed KAM rules, and I've
started becoming a ninja writing my own (simple) rules. MUCH improved
results (amazing when you finally learn what your doing)
I figure before this is all over with, I'm goi
Thanks so much for all the info. I have installed KAM rules, and I've
started becoming a ninja writing my own (simple) rules. MUCH improved
results (amazing when you finally learn what your doing)
I figure before this is all over with, I'm going to have to become very
knowledgeable about
On 11/25/2017 06:35 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
I hardly see any difference: with or without sa updates, the sa grades
are always too low to be useful.
If I disable my own filters, and let sa do the job with its default
rules, the ham/spam ratio is ~10%-90%. With my rules, I get ~95%-5%
inste
I hardly see any difference: with or without sa updates, the sa grades are
always too low to be useful.
If I disable my own filters, and let sa do the job with its default rules, the
ham/spam ratio is ~10%-90%. With my rules, I get ~95%-5% instead.
I think that sa is not different from other re
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 11/23/2017 6:31 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
Would more mirrors be useful? I've got a ton of spare upstream bandwidth
and am in the progress of setting up a few mirrors for other projects.
Sure. Always helps to spread the load more.
All you have to
12 matches
Mail list logo
