Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per token really, really slow or roughly normal? Probably related to fix for bug 7191

2017-11-07 Thread David Gessel
Original Message Subject: Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per token really, really slow or roughly normal? NYTProf results TxRep.pm 1720440 vs 1651114 From: RW To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Date: Tue Nov 07 2017 03:44:50 GMT+0300 (AST) >

Re: Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Il 2017-11-05 16:26 Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: However, you can tell your server to: - not run SA when mail is received from backup MX (I assume you alweays run SA otherwise) - move mail to spam folder when it's scored as spam (I think you have this done already) On 06.11.17 13:01,

Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per token really, really slow or roughly normal?

2017-11-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 04.11.17 16:09, David Gessel wrote: so days later, still chunking away, not making much progress. 1. did you enable bayes_learn_to_journal? 2. do you still run multiple sa-learn jobs in parallel? 3. do you still feed thousands of spam messages to it? there is possibility of storing bayes da