Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per token really, really slow or roughly normal? NYTProf results TxRep.pm 1720440 vs 1651114

2017-11-06 Thread RW
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:59:12 +0300 David Gessel wrote: > FreeBSD is currently installing TxRep.pm rev 1651114 from Jan 12 > 15:17:46 2015 (it is the only revision that has only whitespace > differences, all leading padding, there are code differences between > installed and 1650327 (previous) and 1

Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per token really, really slow or roughly normal? NYTProf results TxRep.pm 1720440 vs 1651114

2017-11-06 Thread David Gessel
FreeBSD is currently installing TxRep.pm rev 1651114 from Jan 12 15:17:46 2015 (it is the only revision that has only whitespace differences, all leading padding, there are code differences between installed and 1650327 (previous) and 1678017 (next). The most recent is 1720440 from Dec 16 20:23

Re: Rule updates?

2017-11-06 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 11/6/2017 11:29 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote: I saw some messages on the list indicating that rule updates were going to resume starting about a week ago.  I haven't heard anything since and still have not seen any updates.  What is the current status? Its a work in progress, there

Re: Rule updates?

2017-11-06 Thread Merijn van den Kroonenberg
> I saw some messages on the list indicating that rule updates were going > to resume starting about a week ago.  I haven't heard anything since and > still have not seen any updates.  What is the current status? Its a work in progress, there was some feedback and some changes which had to be ma

Rule updates?

2017-11-06 Thread Bowie Bailey
I saw some messages on the list indicating that rule updates were going to resume starting about a week ago.  I haven't heard anything since and still have not seen any updates.  What is the current status? -- Bowie

Re: Sending spam forwarded by backup MX directly to primary server spam folder

2017-11-06 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-11-05 16:26 Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: [..] Is there any method to tell "primary server spamassassin" automatically move spam (forwarded by backup MX) to (primary) spam folder? SA does NOT move mail, it only scores mail. ..sorry, I expressed myself badly However, you ca