Re: Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains

2017-10-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
Rupert Gallagher skrev den 2017-10-08 00:55: Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains is a bad idea for at least two reasons: mass-mailing services, and spammers who send from real addresses of people whose passwords were easy to guess. so report spam to dnswl ?

Re: Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains

2017-10-07 Thread Georg Faerber
On 17-10-07 18:55:35, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains is a bad idea for at least two > reasons: mass-mailing services, and spammers who send from real > addresses of people whose passwords were easy to guess. I second this. Cheers, Georg signature.asc Description: Dig

Re: Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains

2017-10-07 Thread Rupert Gallagher
Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains is a bad idea for at least two reasons: mass-mailing services, and spammers who send from real addresses of people whose passwords were easy to guess. Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Matthias Leisi wrote: > Last week at the 41st M3

Re: Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains

2017-10-07 Thread RW
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:12:42 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Matthias Leisi wrote: > > > Note that this only works on DKIM-signed domains (DKIM_VALID). > > ...then shouldn't those negatively-scored rules be meta'd with && > DKIM_VALID? It's doing lookups on domains extract

Re: Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains

2017-10-07 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Matthias Leisi wrote: Note that this only works on DKIM-signed domains (DKIM_VALID). ...then shouldn't those negatively-scored rules be meta'd with && DKIM_VALID? -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #1

Whitelisting DKIM-signed domains

2017-10-07 Thread Matthias Leisi
Last week at the 41st M3AAWG meeting in Toronto there was considerable interest in domain-based whitelisting information when I presented the dnswl.org project. Obviously, this needs to be authenticated, and that’s what we have DKIM for. We created an experimental list dwl.dnswl.org (subject t

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST shortcircuits VBOUNCE, please help...

2017-10-07 Thread RW
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 07:27:00 -0700 (MST) djkraz wrote: > I have a user that is getting thousands of backscatter a minute for a > couple days now. I've tried everything I can find on the web to get > vbounce working with no luck as the user is obviously in the > whitelist since they exist on the se

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST shortcircuits VBOUNCE, please help...

2017-10-07 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Antony Stone wrote: On Saturday 07 October 2017 at 16:27:00, djkraz wrote: I have a user that is getting thousands of backscatter a minute for a couple days now. I've tried everything I can find on the web to get vbounce working with no luck as the user is obviously in the

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST shortcircuits VBOUNCE, please help...

2017-10-07 Thread Antony Stone
On Saturday 07 October 2017 at 16:27:00, djkraz wrote: > I have a user that is getting thousands of backscatter a minute for a > couple days now. I've tried everything I can find on the web to get > vbounce working with no luck as the user is obviously in the whitelist > since they exist on the s

USER_IN_WHITELIST shortcircuits VBOUNCE, please help...

2017-10-07 Thread djkraz
I have a user that is getting thousands of backscatter a minute for a couple days now. I've tried everything I can find on the web to get vbounce working with no luck as the user is obviously in the whitelist since they exist on the server. I've tried setting the priority of vbounce higher but it