Avoid marketing mass-mailers when sending administrative messages.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Jacek Osuchowski wrote:
> We use emails to allow users to reset their passwords to our website. We send
> very brief emails containing the reset password. Example betw
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Jacek Osuchowski skrev den 2017-08-08 00:56:
I understand you trying to provide great software to fight email spam
stop using bad amavisd.conf, ask for help on amavisd maillist since your
issue is not spamassassin
if you like to get a better life
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 19:15 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > version=3.4.0
>
> Version 3.4.0 is like ten years old. I also don't recall BAYES_999
> being available in that version, so one thing or the other is not
> correct.
Minor nitpick: 3.4.0 was released in Feb 2014, slightly less than 10
years ago. ;)
David,
Thanks a lot. I will try to modify the email text to have more 'meat on the
bone'. I am just surprised email with no links, no adds, no attempts to sell
anything can be interpreted as a spam.
That img in the email is a tag from SendGrid email services used to trace
the emails. I don't know
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Jacek Osuchowski wrote:
This is an email I sent to IsNotSpam.com. They list the whole thing when
testing for spam. I am getting a lot of complains from our customers that our
emails are not received. Our domain is not blacklisted anywhere so I suspect it
is the spam filter
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, David Jones wrote:
[snip..]
This IP is listed on SORBS and Spamhaus ZEN which are going to cause problems
with delivery to many receiving mail filters, not just SpamAssassin.
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/68.192.71.191.html
That's his PC which is the MSA. As it's the
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 19:28:04 -0400
"Jacek Osuchowski" wrote:
> This is an email I sent to IsNotSpam.com. They list the whole thing
> when testing for spam. I am getting a lot of complains from our
> customers that our emails are not received. Our domain is not
> blacklisted anywhere so I suspect i
Jacek Osuchowski skrev den 2017-08-08 00:56:
I understand you trying to provide great software to fight email spam
stop using bad amavisd.conf, ask for help on amavisd maillist since your
issue is not spamassassin
if you like to get a better life use spampd instaed of amavisd, amavisd
is s
On 08/07/2017 06:28 PM, Jacek Osuchowski wrote:
This is an email I sent to IsNotSpam.com. They list the whole thing when
testing for spam. I am getting a lot of complains from our customers that our
emails are not received. Our domain is not blacklisted anywhere so I suspect it
is the spam fil
[Just replying to one aspect of the original message.]
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:26:00 -0500
David Jones wrote:
> First, it's a bad idea for a number of reasons to send passwords via
> email. Most modern "lost password" mail loops use a unique URL that
> expires after a short period of time.
As
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Jacek Osuchowski wrote:
We use emails to allow users to reset their passwords to our website. We
send very brief emails containing the reset password. Example between :
Your password to access your account is:
S]U3bC
On 08/07/2017 05:56 PM, Jacek Osuchowski wrote:
We use emails to allow users to reset their passwords to our website. We
send very brief emails containing the reset password. Example between :
Your password to access your account is:
S]U3bC7k
Upon successful login you may change your
This is an email I sent to IsNotSpam.com. They list the whole thing when
testing for spam. I am getting a lot of complains from our customers that our
emails are not received. Our domain is not blacklisted anywhere so I suspect it
is the spam filtering (as IsNotSpam tool indicates). Is there any
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Jacek Osuchowski wrote:
> We use emails to allow users to reset their passwords to our website. We
> send very brief emails containing the reset password. Example between :
>
>>
> Your password to access your account is:
>
> S]U3bC7k
>
> Upon successful
We use emails to allow users to reset their passwords to our website. We
send very brief emails containing the reset password. Example between :
>
Your password to access your account is:
S]U3bC7k
Upon successful login you may change your password by going to Modify
Account / C
On 08/07/2017 02:53 PM, Scott wrote:
David:
re: Postscreen weighted RBLs
I've got my postscreen setup with some weighted RBL's. But I was curious
what others did here. I searched for that subject and didn't get any
specific hits. Any particular thread you know of?
See the bottom of this p
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:17 -0500, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> I tried SYMBOLS. You are correct that it lists the tests, but not the
> results:
>
> BAYES_95,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML_MESSAGE,JAM_DO_STH_HERE,LOTS_OF_MONEY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
> [...]
>
> But I saw this line in a forum discussion... So I'm
David:
re: Postscreen weighted RBLs
I've got my postscreen setup with some weighted RBL's. But I was curious
what others did here. I searched for that subject and didn't get any
specific hits. Any particular thread you know of?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346
David,
Thanks, I'll try REPORT .
I am indeed using the full spamd invocation as you described. I just
abbreviated it in my orig post. It has been working for a couple of
years. I'm just seeing a few spams that I can't seem to get rid of.
I've tried training BAYES with them. But I'm still
I tried SYMBOLS. You are correct that it lists the tests, but not the
results:
BAYES_95,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML_MESSAGE,JAM_DO_STH_HERE,LOTS_OF_MONEY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SUBJ_DOLLARS,T_HTML_TAG_BALANCE_CENTER,URIBL_BLOCKED
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I'm invoking spamd using:
CHECK SPAMC/1.2\r\n
I'm getting the expected response such as:
Spam: False ; -1.8 / 4.0
I am trying to figure out how to get the TESTS= results of the individual
tests returned as well.
(e.g.tests=[AWL=-1.103, BAYES_00=-2
On 2017-08-06 10:37, Scott wrote:
> Centos7
> Posftfix 3.2.2
> Amavisd 2.11.0
> spamassassin-3.4.0
> To: r...@mail2.myserver.com
> From: logwa...@mail2.myserver.com
Since these are locally submitted messages (i.e. not SMTP), IMO the best
and cleanest way to deal with it is to tell the MTA not to
I'm invoking spamd using:
CHECK SPAMC/1.2\r\n
I'm getting the expected response such as:
Spam: False ; -1.8 / 4.0
I am trying to figure out how to get the TESTS= results of the individual tests
returned as well.
(e.g.tests=[AWL=-1.103, BAYES_00=-2.599,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,URIBL_BLACK=1.955,
On 08/07/2017 08:37 AM, Scott wrote:
spamassassin-3.4.1-14.fc27.src.rpm is available now.
When trying to rebuild that src (or the one you mentioned earlier) for my
Centos7 box I get these warnings:
Is this OK? Is there a fix?
spamc/libspamc.c: In function '_try_to_connect_tcp':
spamc/libspam
On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:37:36 -0700 (MST)
Scott wrote:
> Centos7
> Posftfix 3.2.2
> Amavisd 2.11.0
> spamassassin-3.4.0
>
> I have a logwatch output that gets mailed to me daily. Spamassassin
> is scoring it high enough as exceed my threshold for whacking it as
> spam.
>
> While this is not goo
On 08/07/2017 08:25 AM, Naisiew Yeak wrote:
Hi All,
Recently we notice some increased of spam mostly related to drugs, like
medication, health and so on. Is that correct? Does anyone of you
experiencing the same?
The current updated version is 1799552 since June 2017.
That is the latest v
spamassassin-3.4.1-14.fc27.src.rpm is available now.
When trying to rebuild that src (or the one you mentioned earlier) for my
Centos7 box I get these warnings:
Is this OK? Is there a fix?
spamc/libspamc.c: In function '_try_to_connect_tcp':
spamc/libspamc.c:490:19: warning: variable 'family'
Hi All,
Recently we notice some increased of spam mostly related to drugs, like
medication, health and so on. Is that correct? Does anyone of you
experiencing the same?
The current updated version is 1799552 since June 2017.
Thanks.
--
Naisiew Yeak
On 08/06/2017 05:10 PM, msxc wrote:
I have a logwatch output that gets mailed to me daily. Spamassassin is
scoring it high enough as exceed my threshold for whacking it as spam.
Please subscribe to the list for future posts.
However, I would argue that this is expected behavior because your
lo
>> I have a logwatch output that gets mailed to me daily. Spamassassin is
>> scoring it high enough as exceed my threshold for whacking it as spam.
>Please subscribe to the list for future posts.
>
>However, I would argue that this is expected behavior because your
>logwatch notice almost certainl
30 matches
Mail list logo
