Test Mail

2017-07-17 Thread Vikram Goyal
test delivery. kindly ignore. thanks

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread Robert Kudyba
> On Jul 17, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > > On 17-07-17 16:39, Robert Kudyba wrote: >> >>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Hendrikx >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 17-07-17 16:00, Robert Kudyba wrote: > On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Antony Stone > >

Re: "bout u" campaign

2017-07-17 Thread Kevin Golding
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:38:24 +0100, David Jones wrote: It would be nice if there was a local tool that could be part of the SA project that would extend the masscheck processing and help build content and meta rules. As John's already mentioned, there is a surprising array of tools already

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread RW
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:33:42 -0400 Robert Kudyba wrote: > > try running > > > > spamassassin -D razor2 > > < /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/sample-spam.txt > > > > as the user amavis. > > su - -s /bin/bash amavis -c "spamassassin -D razor2 > < /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/sample-spam.txt" .

Re: "bout u" campaign

2017-07-17 Thread David Jones
On 07/17/2017 12:03 PM, Jesse Norell wrote: This description: On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:07 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: I'm continuing to get good results from a multi-level approach: I use two or more subrules with low scores (0.01 or so) that are combined by an AND relation in a meta-rule th

Re: "bout u" campaign

2017-07-17 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Jesse Norell wrote: Does masscheck automate meta rule creation? (ie. not just generate scores) Not the full "evolution filter" idea which would have to run on the endpoint, but that would benefit everyone via rule updates. No, it does not. There were a couple of rule gen

Re: "bout u" campaign

2017-07-17 Thread Jesse Norell
This description: On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:07 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > I'm continuing to get good results from a multi-level approach: > > I use two or more subrules with low scores (0.01 or so) that are > combined by an AND relation in a meta-rule that triggers a suitably > spammy score w

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 17-07-17 16:39, Robert Kudyba wrote: > >> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Hendrikx > > wrote: >> >> On 17-07-17 16:00, Robert Kudyba wrote: >>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Antony Stone >>>

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread RW
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:39:39 -0400 Robert Kudyba wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Hendrikx > > wrote: > > The error is still the same. Do you even have access to those > > cloudmark razor servers? Does razor work outside of > > spamassassin/amavisd? > > Is that supposed to be a pa

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread Robert Kudyba
> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > > On 17-07-17 16:00, Robert Kudyba wrote: >> >>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Antony Stone >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> On Monday 17 July 2017 at 14:25:17, Robert Kudyba wrote: >>> > On Jul 1

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 17-07-17 16:00, Robert Kudyba wrote: > >> On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Antony Stone >> > > wrote: >> >> On Monday 17 July 2017 at 14:25:17, Robert Kudyba wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2017, at 4:00 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas mailto:uh...@fantoma

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread Robert Kudyba
> On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Antony Stone > wrote: > > On Monday 17 July 2017 at 14:25:17, Robert Kudyba wrote: > >>> On Jul 14, 2017, at 4:00 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas > wrote: Robert Kudyba wrote: > Over the past few days sending mail via SquirrelMail has become > glacial.

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 17 July 2017 at 14:25:17, Robert Kudyba wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2017, at 4:00 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> Robert Kudyba wrote: > >>> Over the past few days sending mail via SquirrelMail has become > >>> glacial. The load on the server is under 1. I've restarted the SA, > >>>

Re: reason why sendmail w/ SA3.4.1 scantime=15.0, delay=00:01:06 w/ SquirrelMail?

2017-07-17 Thread Robert Kudyba
> On Jul 14, 2017, at 4:00 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> Robert Kudyba wrote: >>> Over the past few days sending mail via SquirrelMail has become glacial. >>> The load on the server is under 1. I've restarted the SA, sendmail and >>> dovecot processes several times. Here are >>> some