Hi,
> pretty high mainly due to DCC and BAYES_99.
Are you paying for DCC? I think we're over their limit and they
blacklisted us long ago, lol.
> I guess I have well trained Bayes.
I think you just don't have many one-liner emails as a regular course
of business?
> 1.2 RCVD_IN_LASHBACK
On 07/12/2017 08:04 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone else experienced a spam campaign with any one of the
following subjects:
- sometimes enjoy it wild, how bout you?
- sometimes like it ruff, what bout you?
- sumtimes enjoy it ruff, wat bout you?
The body contains something like "wild hukup
On 7/12/2017 9:04 PM, Alex wrote:
Has anyone else experienced a spam campaign with any one of the
following subjects:
0 hits today on this, nothing that's gotten through for me on our servers.
Hi all,
Has anyone else experienced a spam campaign with any one of the
following subjects:
- sometimes enjoy it wild, how bout you?
- sometimes like it ruff, what bout you?
- sumtimes enjoy it ruff, wat bout you?
The body contains something like "wild hukups" then a phone number.
https://paste
One thing pointing to maybe a need for reworking the training logic is
that I have txrep_track_messages at the default (1), and almost every
message in my corpus has already been trained; each run brings in only a
handful of new messages (usually 10-20, but often 0, and always < 100).
It sure seems
Hello,
I have txrep data in a mysql database, and am working on a training
script to run sa-learn; with bayes also in MySQL and a corpus size of
5279 nspam and 849 nham, sa-learn takes a full 2 hours to run with txrep
enabled (use_txrep 1), but only 13 minutes with txrep disabled
(use_txrep 0).
