Re: Forged yahoo FP

2017-05-07 Thread Lyle Evans
At 03:45 PM 5/7/2017, you wrote: Hi, Would someone help me confirm this is an FP for FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD? It does indeed go through yahoo, but his then passed through spamcow.com before passing through interwrx.com, then through ours (example.com): https://pastebin.com/5WgWLBiB Looks like it is

Re: Forged yahoo FP

2017-05-07 Thread Lyle Evans
At 03:45 PM 5/7/2017, you wrote: Hi, Would someone help me confirm this is an FP for FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD? It does indeed go through yahoo, but his then passed through spamcow.com before passing through interwrx.com, then through ours (example.com): https://pastebin.com/5WgWLBiB Looks like it is

Strange audio spam

2017-05-07 Thread doark
I received this very unusual email a few days ago. It (or another email), timed out my spamassassin check (which is a first). I'm including the full text of the spam below along with all of the headers. I'm interested if this mail is legit, or if it's just a new trap. I have skipped through parts

Forged yahoo FP

2017-05-07 Thread Alex
Hi, Would someone help me confirm this is an FP for FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD? It does indeed go through yahoo, but his then passed through spamcow.com before passing through interwrx.com, then through ours (example.com): https://pastebin.com/5WgWLBiB

Re: txrep and spam lists

2017-05-07 Thread RW
On Sun, 07 May 2017 15:05:21 +0100 Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 13:27 +0100, RW wrote: > > On Sun, 07 May 2017 10:33:56 +0100 > > Martin Gregorie wrote: > > The only other thing you need is a way remove SA headers from your > > > spam collection. A bash script using awk to do t

Re: txrep and spam lists

2017-05-07 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 13:27 +0100, RW wrote: > On Sun, 07 May 2017 10:33:56 +0100 > Martin Gregorie wrote: > The only other thing you need is a way remove SA headers from your > > spam collection. A bash script using awk to do the heavy lifting > > works for me: > > > > That s

Re: Strict/Relaxed DKIM alignment possible with SA?

2017-05-07 Thread RW
On Sun, 7 May 2017 13:08:03 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 07.05.17 12:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: > >I have played around with it and SA is not performing actual SPF > >queries/validations due to the use of spampd on localhost as a > >proxy. SA needs a trusted internal received header

Re: txrep and spam lists

2017-05-07 Thread RW
On Sun, 07 May 2017 10:33:56 +0100 Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 00:37 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > why not back that spam up to gmail ? :=) > > > Even easier: save them to a directory as text files and make sure > that's included in your daily/weekly backups. > > The only

Re: Strict/Relaxed DKIM alignment possible with SA?

2017-05-07 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 07.05.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: >>> > > On 07.05.17 00:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: >>> > > > Thanks for all the great advice so far. >>> > > > >>> > > > Currently I'm playing around with opendkim->opendmarc->amavisd >>> on my >>> > > > testserver. >>> > > > >>> > > > My curren

Re: Strict/Relaxed DKIM alignment possible with SA?

2017-05-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > On 07.05.17 00:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: > > > Thanks for all the great advice so far. > > > > > > Currently I'm playing around with opendkim->opendmarc->amavisd on my > > > testserver. > > > > > > My current postfix setup is using spampd as proxy and thus any > > > opendkim/opendmarc milters

Re: Strict/Relaxed DKIM alignment possible with SA?

2017-05-07 Thread Thore Boedecker
On 07.05.17 - 12:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > On 07.05.17 00:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: > > > > Thanks for all the great advice so far. > > > > > > > > Currently I'm playing around with opendkim->opendmarc->amavisd on my > > > > testserver. > > > > > > > > My current postfix setup is usi

Re: Strict/Relaxed DKIM alignment possible with SA?

2017-05-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 07.05.17 00:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: > Thanks for all the great advice so far. > > Currently I'm playing around with opendkim->opendmarc->amavisd on my > testserver. > > My current postfix setup is using spampd as proxy and thus any > opendkim/opendmarc milters won't work in cojunction. >

Re: Strict/Relaxed DKIM alignment possible with SA?

2017-05-07 Thread Thore Boedecker
On 07.05.17 - 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 07.05.17 00:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: > > Thanks for all the great advice so far. > > > > Currently I'm playing around with opendkim->opendmarc->amavisd on my > > testserver. > > > > My current postfix setup is using spampd as proxy and thu

Re: Strict/Relaxed DKIM alignment possible with SA?

2017-05-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 07.05.17 00:46, Thore Boedecker wrote: Thanks for all the great advice so far. Currently I'm playing around with opendkim->opendmarc->amavisd on my testserver. My current postfix setup is using spampd as proxy and thus any opendkim/opendmarc milters won't work in cojunction. I've been plann

Re: txrep and spam lists

2017-05-07 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 00:37 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > why not back that spam up to gmail ? :=) > Even easier: save them to a directory as text files and make sure that's included in your daily/weekly backups. The only other thing you need is a way remove SA headers from your spam collection.