On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Michael Grant wrote:
[snip..]
The problem is caused by innocentbytan...@ymail.com IN THE BODY!
This seems a bit overzealous. It seems like a bit of an over-reach to look at
headers in the BODY of the message.
This is an excellent rule except for this rude message body
We find FREEMAIL_REPLYTO to be quite successful at weeding out spam so we
raised up to 9.1. i.e. with this in local.cf:
score FREEMAIL_REPLYTO 9.1
However, it causes a false positive with FREEMAIL_REPLYTO and it got me
very curious:
Here's a sanitized minimal example that triggers this (ind
Hello Spamassassin
Please i need to add the function MailSpike and Freemail, i see that
here Running Local.cf file and i need
to add any settings for this two services that i need to add.
But i dont know how to do this, i have try to read man Spamassassins but
i dont found nothing.
So please
On 03/09/2017 06:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/9/2017 12:26 PM, Axb wrote:
On 03/09/2017 06:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/9/2017 12:04 PM, Cedric Knight wrote:
Compared to RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, which I think Axb manually adjusted down
to 0.5 back in September, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits
On 3/9/2017 12:26 PM, Axb wrote:
On 03/09/2017 06:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/9/2017 12:04 PM, Cedric Knight wrote:
Compared to RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, which I think Axb manually adjusted
down
to 0.5 back in September, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits about a tenth as much,
atm there's a ton of
On 03/09/2017 06:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/9/2017 12:04 PM, Cedric Knight wrote:
Well, not based on mass checks or any advanced analysis or anything, it
just stops obvious Facebook etc ham being marked as spam, so working
much better than the previous score of 3.253.
Compared to RCVD_
On 3/9/2017 12:04 PM, Cedric Knight wrote:
Well, not based on mass checks or any advanced analysis or anything, it
just stops obvious Facebook etc ham being marked as spam, so working
much better than the previous score of 3.253.
Compared to RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, which I think Axb manually adjuste
On 09/03/17 13:26, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 3/9/2017 8:22 AM, Cedric Knight wrote:
>> I've reduced the score on my installation to 0.5. Would this kind of
>> thing be prevented by more people contributing to the mass checks? Or
>> could it be adjusted downwards as Alex suggested?
>
> I don't
On 03/09/2017 05:03 PM, Axb wrote:
On 03/09/2017 04:58 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 16:05, Axb pisze:
On 03/09/2017 03:11 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 15:05, mar...@mejor.pl pisze:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 14:42, Axb pisze:
On 03/09/2017 02:31 PM, mar...@mejor.
On 03/09/2017 04:58 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 16:05, Axb pisze:
On 03/09/2017 03:11 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 15:05, mar...@mejor.pl pisze:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 14:42, Axb pisze:
On 03/09/2017 02:31 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 17:30
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 16:05, Axb pisze:
> On 03/09/2017 03:11 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
>> W dniu 09.03.2017 o 15:05, mar...@mejor.pl pisze:
>>> W dniu 09.03.2017 o 14:42, Axb pisze:
On 03/09/2017 02:31 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
> W dniu 08.03.2017 o 17:30, Axb pisze:
>> On 03/08/2017
On 03/09/2017 03:11 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 15:05, mar...@mejor.pl pisze:
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 14:42, Axb pisze:
On 03/09/2017 02:31 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 17:30, Axb pisze:
On 03/08/2017 04:55 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 16:33
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 15:05, mar...@mejor.pl pisze:
> W dniu 09.03.2017 o 14:42, Axb pisze:
>> On 03/09/2017 02:31 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
>>> W dniu 08.03.2017 o 17:30, Axb pisze:
On 03/08/2017 04:55 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
> W dniu 08.03.2017 o 16:33, Axb pisze:
>> On 03/08/2017
W dniu 09.03.2017 o 14:42, Axb pisze:
> On 03/09/2017 02:31 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
>> W dniu 08.03.2017 o 17:30, Axb pisze:
>>> On 03/08/2017 04:55 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 16:33, Axb pisze:
> On 03/08/2017 04:16 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
>> W dniu 08.03.2017
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2017-03-09 13:35:
Please submit your bugs, patches and comments ASAP if you'd like it
considered for this release!
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6451
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7233
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_
On 03/09/2017 02:31 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 17:30, Axb pisze:
On 03/08/2017 04:55 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 16:33, Axb pisze:
On 03/08/2017 04:16 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 16:06, Axb pisze:
On 03/08/2017 03:58 PM, mar...@mejor.
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 17:30, Axb pisze:
> On 03/08/2017 04:55 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
>> W dniu 08.03.2017 o 16:33, Axb pisze:
>>> On 03/08/2017 04:16 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2017 o 16:06, Axb pisze:
> On 03/08/2017 03:58 PM, mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
>> W dniu 08.03.2017
On 3/9/2017 8:22 AM, Cedric Knight wrote:
I've reduced the score on my installation to 0.5. Would this kind of
thing be prevented by more people contributing to the mass checks? Or
could it be adjusted downwards as Alex suggested?
I don't know if it's a floating rule but it sounds like it nee
On 11/09/16 22:10, Alex wrote:
>> COMMIT/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf
>>
>> Committed revision 1760066.
>>
>> score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM 0 0.5 0 0.5
>>
>> should show up after next SA update
>
> Has RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB been considered for adjustment as well? It's
> hitting a lot more ham than spam here, i
Good morning everyone,
It's time to get 3.4.2 out the door. I will be building a release
candidate each Friday of this month with the plan to have something
releaseable by March 31st.
Please submit your bugs, patches and comments ASAP if you'd like it
considered for this release!
Regards,
20 matches
Mail list logo
