>From: Dianne Skoll
>On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:06:34 -0500
>Rob McEwen wrote:
>> On 1/30/2017 8:54 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> > they do and it has been mentioned:
>> > https://help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN23997.html
>Yahoo Outbound IP addresses | Yahoo Help - SLN23997
>help.yahoo.com
>Yahoo
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:06:34 -0500
Rob McEwen wrote:
> On 1/30/2017 8:54 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > they do and it has been mentioned:
> > https://help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN23997.html
Cool. So Yahoo uses an HTML page that's a pain to process by
computer. Microsoft has
https://support.co
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:40:26 +
David Jones wrote:
> My goal in whitelisting Yahoo servers is to make sure these
> messages get to MailScanner where they are not whitelisted
> and are scores based more on content by Spamassassin rather
> than sender reputation (DNSBLs).
OK, understood now.
I
On 1/30/2017 8:54 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
they do and it has been mentioned:
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN23997.html
I wasn't aware of this page. If it was mentioned before in this thread,
I missed it. Thanks!
--
Rob McEwen
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:47:18 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> on postscreen level there is no SPF
And that's relevant... how?
You use a proper filter to do proper filtering.
Regards,
Dianne.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:33:24 +
David Jones wrote:
[deleted]
Read back through this thread. I never said their SPF record is
invalid. All I said is their SPF record is not common and it makes it
very hard for anyone to know what the official Yahoo outbound mail
servers are.
I have read th
>From: Rob McEwen
>Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 10:40 PM
>On 1/29/2017 7:42 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:33:24 +
>> David Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Read back through this thread. I never said their SPF record is
>>> invalid. All I said is their SPF record is not common and