On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 14:18:38 +
geoff.sa_users_161...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
> Ah, I think I've been making an invalid assumption here...
> Because every one of these messages had a UNPARSEABLE_RELAY and
> nothing else, I thought that this issue was stopping any other tests
> being applied. Wh
On 03/12/2016 13:57, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25/11/2016 11:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This says that the mail was received from webpage on your server,
and the
local mailer "nullmailer" seems have delivered it directly to you.
in fact, you don't know anything about this mail -
On 25/11/2016 11:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This says that the mail was received from webpage on your server,
and the
local mailer "nullmailer" seems have delivered it directly to you.
in fact, you don't know anything about this mail - it was apparently
received via HTTP, but the SendMai
On 28/11/2016 22:10, geoff.sa_users_161...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
On 25/11/2016 11:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 24.11.16 10:23, Geoff Soper wrote:
Subject: Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
For a few weeks I've been suffering spam messages with attachments
getting through w
