Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2016, 07:07 +0100 schrieb Axb:
> On 11/29/2016 12:14 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what's the return value if an IP is listed on bl.spameatingmonkey.net?
> > Seems to be 127.0.0.2. When is the return value 127.0.0.3? Can't find
> > anything on their website.
On 11/29/2016 12:14 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote:
Hi,
what's the return value if an IP is listed on bl.spameatingmonkey.net?
Seems to be 127.0.0.2. When is the return value 127.0.0.3? Can't find
anything on their website.
what about
http://spameatingmonkey.com/usage.html
Hi,
what's the return value if an IP is listed on bl.spameatingmonkey.net?
Seems to be 127.0.0.2. When is the return value 127.0.0.3? Can't find
anything on their website.
Ciao
Marcus
--
"It's hard to be mad at someone who misses you while you're asleep." -Calvin
On 25/11/2016 11:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 24.11.16 10:23, Geoff Soper wrote:
Subject: Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
For a few weeks I've been suffering spam messages with attachments
getting through with a suspicious score of 0.0. Upon inspection,
they all had the fo
On 27 Nov 2016, at 11:28, Alex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a recent upgrade to perl-5.24.0 on fedora25 with
> spamassassin-3.4.1, I'm seeing this bug:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7332
>
> There hasn't been any updates since it was created. Am I missing something?
Nope. U
