Re: "Complex regular subexpression recursion limit exceeded" error from sa-learn

2016-11-24 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Benny Pedersen wrote: Rich Wales skrev den 2016-11-24 06:01: > _OK, I can repro on trunk: . . . It's that very long block of QP > blanks right at the end. . . . Please open a bug and attach that > spample as a repro test case._ Done. (https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssas

Re: "Complex regular subexpression recursion limit exceeded" error from sa-learn

2016-11-24 Thread Rich Wales
> try disabling any local rules to see if it helps. . . . > it's apparently about rules, not about mail content. I temporarily removed my local.cf file, but I still got the warning. Rich Wales ri...@richw.org

Re: Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY

2016-11-24 Thread RW
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:09:28 + RW wrote: > UNPARSEABLE_RELAY is only a significant problem if it's on the edge of > your internal or trusted network. These relays should be the > first--force-expire entries in the above two headers - check that they > are sensible. Sorry, --force-expire got

Re: Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY

2016-11-24 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 24.11.16 10:23, Geoff Soper wrote: Subject: Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY For a few weeks I've been suffering spam messages with attachments getting through with a suspicious score of 0.0. Upon inspection, they all had the following lines in the header: X-Spam-Checker-Versio

Re: Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY

2016-11-24 Thread RW
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:33:19 +0100 Axb wrote: > On 11/24/2016 11:23 AM, Geoff Soper wrote: > > For a few weeks I've been suffering spam messages with attachments > > getting through with a suspicious score of 0.0. Upon inspection, > > they all had the following lines in the header: > > > > ... > >

Re: Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY

2016-11-24 Thread Axb
On 11/24/2016 11:23 AM, Geoff Soper wrote: For a few weeks I've been suffering spam messages with attachments getting through with a suspicious score of 0.0. Upon inspection, they all had the following lines in the header: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on server.alp

Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY

2016-11-24 Thread Geoff Soper
For a few weeks I've been suffering spam messages with attachments getting through with a suspicious score of 0.0. Upon inspection, they all had the following lines in the header: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on server.alphaworks.co.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Sta

Re: "Complex regular subexpression recursion limit exceeded" error from sa-learn

2016-11-24 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 23.11.16 15:24, Rich Wales wrote: I'm running Postfix, Spamassassin, amavisd-new, and Dovecot on an Ubuntu 16.04 LTS server. For some time now, I've been running my inbox and junk folder through *sa-learn* every night, in order to educate my e-mail server about spam messages that make it past