On 11/23/16 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> and output to this ticket of "spamassassin --lint -D 2>&1 >/tmp.txt"
> so all installed plugins versions are known, in case its already fixed
Done.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
Rich Wales skrev den 2016-11-24 06:01:
_OK, I can repro on trunk: . . . It's that very long block of QP
blanks right at the end. . . . Please open a bug and attach that
spample as a repro test case._
Done. (https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7374)
disable html postings on m
> /OK, I can repro on trunk: . . . It's that very long block of QP
> blanks right at the end. . . . Please open a bug and attach that
> spample as a repro test case./
Done. (https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7374)
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Rich Wales wrote:
/The RE at that line looks pretty firmly anchored... Can you gzip up a
sample that fails for you and send it to me?/
Sure. See the attachment.
OK, I can repro on trunk:
Nov 23 19:17:00.141 [18349] dbg: message: HTML::Parser utf8_mode on (assumed
UTF-
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Rich Wales wrote:
I'm running Postfix, Spamassassin, amavisd-new, and Dovecot on an Ubuntu
16.04 LTS server.
For some time now, I've been running my inbox and junk folder through
*sa-learn* every night, in order to educate my e-mail server about spam
messages that make it p
I'm running Postfix, Spamassassin, amavisd-new, and Dovecot on an Ubuntu
16.04 LTS server.
For some time now, I've been running my inbox and junk folder through
*sa-learn* every night, in order to educate my e-mail server about spam
messages that make it past Spamassassin but which I subsequently
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>> I get a lot of spam that passes the RP_MATCHES_RCVD test; it wouldn't
>>> make it into my inbox otherwise. I see the scoring recently got bumped
>>> to -3.0, which makes false negatives even more likely.
>>>
>>> I'm not expert enough in
Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
I get a lot of spam that passes the RP_MATCHES_RCVD test; it wouldn't
make it into my inbox otherwise. I see the scoring recently got bumped
to -3.0, which makes false negatives even more likely.
I'm not expert enough in the nature of spam to really understand why
this tes
Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I get a lot of spam that passes the RP_MATCHES_RCVD test; it wouldn't
> make it into my inbox otherwise. I see the scoring recently got bumped
> to -3.0, which makes false negatives even more likely.
>
> I'm not expert enough in the nature of spam to really understand why
On 22 Nov 2016, at 17:54, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
I get a lot of spam that passes the RP_MATCHES_RCVD test; it wouldn't
make it into my inbox otherwise. I see the scoring recently got bumped
to -3.0, which makes false negatives even more likely.
I'm not expert enough in the nature of spam to rea
On 22.11.16 13:11, MRob wrote:
I'd like to ask if SA scoring would be affected by potential changes
in the envelope fields (which presumably depends on when in the mail
flow SA is used, Postfix in this case):
* content_filter when receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
(sent to filter v
On Nov 22, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I get a lot of spam that passes the RP_MATCHES_RCVD test; it wouldn't
> make it into my inbox otherwise. I see the scoring recently got bumped
> to -3.0, which makes false negatives even more likely.
I do see this in spam, but I see it so much
12 matches
Mail list logo
