Something like that must be John...
I will check my scripts once more...
Thanks!
>No problem, sometimes the obvious is overlooked.
>
>Perhaps the compile failed and SA is using the last good results?
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Pedro David Marco wrote:
I'm assuming that you *are* recompiling the rules and restarting
spamd/Amavis after you make changes to the rules?
sure, forgot to mention, sorry...
No problem, sometimes the obvious is overlooked.
Perhaps the compile failed and SA is using the
>I'm assuming that you *are* recompiling the rules and restarting
>spamd/Amavis after you make changes to the rules?
sure, forgot to mention, sorry...
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Pedro David Marco wrote:
I have a doubt about compiled rules with sa-compile: Precedence between
a "rule" and its compiled version is automatic so as long as the rule is
not modified, the compiled rule will take precedence, am i right?I have
noticed that sometimes (only so
Hi!
I have a doubt about compiled rules with sa-compile:
Precedence between a "rule" and its compiled version is automatic so as long as
the rule is not modified, the compiled rule will take precedence, am i right?I
have noticed that sometimes (only sometimes) if i modify the rule, spamassassin
Great!
Thanks!
Pedro.
From: RW
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: Define new variables in local.cf
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 04:39:55 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Hi!
> When you the same string repeated many times in a
