Even the CSA guys told us not to use UCEProtect.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
- Boris Behrens
> Am 03.11.2016 um 00:12 schrieb Kevin Miller :
>
> Isn’t it obvious? It’s the NSA. J
>
> ...Kevin
> --
> Kevin Miller
> Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
> 155 South Seward Street
> Juneau, A
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Alex wrote:
>> I've had to lower the score on my header XBL check because it was
>> triggering on so many dynamic IPs that were clearly reassigned to new
>> users, then being blacklisted. I'd appreciate it if anyone could
>> provide additi
Isn’t it obvious? It’s the NSA. ☺
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 307357
From: Joe Quinn [mailto:jqu...@pccc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2
On 11/2/2016 2:46 PM, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Zitat von Marco :
Sorry, I know this is not uceprotect list, but I don't know how to
contact uceprotect, their contact form is unavailable.
It seems the problem starts on 30 october. Did you have noticed too
something about?
UCE Protect has a very
Zitat von Marco :
Sorry, I know this is not uceprotect list, but I don't know how to
contact uceprotect, their contact form is unavailable.
It seems the problem starts on 30 october. Did you have noticed too
something about?
UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason
Hello Marco, hello List,
There was a DNS issue we are currently investigating.
If your system still response a hit to any queries against our RBL
please flush your dns cache or use temporarily another dns resolver
until the cache of your upstream is cleared.
We apologize and will take steps to pr
Thanks for your help!
I discovered AWL enable in init.pre which short-circuit all other plugins. I
disabled AWL and spamassassin is working fine now.
Thanks for your help!
_Motty
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2
On 01.11.16 11:24, Motty Cruz wrote:
Very strange, missed configuration, here is another header and I have not
change any configuration and yet this one was scanned:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.604 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.6
tests=[AWL=2.468, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.076, DKIM_SIGNED=0
Alex wrote:
> I've had to lower the score on my header XBL check because it was
> triggering on so many dynamic IPs that were clearly reassigned to new
> users, then being blacklisted. I'd appreciate it if anyone could
> provide additional input on how they might use something like this.
>
> heade
Hello,
do you know if are the uceprotect's servers compromised?
I see these strange results:
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 <<>>
42.215.85.209.dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28044
;; flags: qr
10 matches
Mail list logo