Re: Is greylisting effective? (was Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold)

2016-07-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.07.2016 um 23:10 schrieb Bill Cole: On 30 Jul 2016, at 7:10, Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge wrote: I'm no expert here, but postgrey is usually a purely local test. It should terminate with a "currently busy, try again later" message very quickly. Unless your database is very large, yes. SPF

Re: Is greylisting effective? (was Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold)

2016-07-30 Thread Bill Cole
On 30 Jul 2016, at 7:10, Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge wrote: I'm no expert here, but postgrey is usually a purely local test. It should terminate with a "currently busy, try again later" message very quickly. Unless your database is very large, yes. SPF checks and white listing require dns lookups

Re: Is greylisting effective? (was Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold)

2016-07-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.07.2016 um 13:10 schrieb Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge: On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 30.07.2016 um 03:34 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 29.07.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Dianne Skoll: On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:39:15 +0200 Robert Schetterer wrote: I don't use postfix or postscreen.

Re: Is greylisting effective? (was Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold)

2016-07-30 Thread Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 30.07.2016 um 03:34 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 29.07.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Dianne Skoll: On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:39:15 +0200 Robert Schetterer wrote: I don't use postfix or postscreen. hm.. that does not fit the subject..why did you involved