Lorenzo Thurman wrote on 8/07/16 9:26 AM:
> Thanks for the info. Does anyone know how I can use whitelistfrom_rcvd? I
> can't find any clear answers via Google.
>
Excuse my typo for the correct spelling whitelist_from_rcvd.
To use it, look at the legitimate emails that you want to whitelist an
Am 07.07.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Lorenzo Thurman:
Thanks for the info. Does anyone know how I can use whitelistfrom_rcvd? I can't
find any clear answers via Google.
besides the typo the same way as the other whitelist options
the only difference is the second param with is the DNS-PTR of the
"My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the Funky Chicken" -- The
Full Monty
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>
> Lorenzo Thurman wrote on 8/07/16 3:03 AM:
>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Antony Stone
>>> wrote:
>>> \.microsoft\.com$ will match anything endi
Lorenzo Thurman wrote on 8/07/16 3:03 AM:
>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Antony Stone
>> wrote:
>> \.microsoft\.com$ will match anything ending in ".microsoft.com"
RW already pointed this out, but to make sure nobody reading this thread
misses it, the above is wrong because whitelist does not us
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:03:37 -0500
Lorenzo Thurman wrote:
y
>
> > On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Antony Stone
> > wrote:
> > There's a big difference between subdomains, and domains with
> > letters in front of "microsoft".
> >
> > \.microsoft\.com$ will match anything ending in ".microsoft.com"
>
"My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the Funky Chicken" -- The
Full Monty
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Antony Stone
> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 07 July 2016 at 15:08:44, Lorenzo Thurman wrote:
>
>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2016 um 14:12 s
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:08:44 -0500
Lorenzo Thurman wrote:
> >
> > well the ^ followed by .* is also pointless
>
>
> I see. Thanks for the tip,
It wasn't really a tip. The globs (wildcards) get converted into
regularly expressions that aren't quite as mimimalist as the could be
- but that's n
On Thursday 07 July 2016 at 15:08:44, Lorenzo Thurman wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> Am 07.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Joe Quinn:
> >> In addition to the above, it's easy for a spammer to register something
> >> like kajsdhfkjasghdskghlaskfhmicrosoft.com which would
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:15:18 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> should at least look similar to that:
> ^.*\.microsoft\.com$
>
> well the ^ followed by .* is also pointless
It's generated from a glob in the configuration.
"My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the Funky Chicken" -- The
Full Monty
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 07.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Joe Quinn:
>>> On 7/6/2016 11:42 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
>>> On 6 Jul 2016, at 23:10, lorenzo wrote:
>>>
>>> [...
Am 07.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Joe Quinn:
On 7/6/2016 11:42 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 6 Jul 2016, at 23:10, lorenzo wrote:
[...]
The output from spamassassin -t -D < In-whitelist.txt gives the
answer, I believe:
address hefg...@hkjhkjhk.onmicrosoft.com matches whitelist or
blacklist regexp: ^
On 7/6/2016 11:42 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 6 Jul 2016, at 23:10, lorenzo wrote:
[...]
The output from spamassassin -t -D < In-whitelist.txt gives the
answer, I believe:
address hefg...@hkjhkjhk.onmicrosoft.com matches whitelist or
blacklist regexp: ^.*microsoft\.com$
Very sneaky. I think I
12 matches
Mail list logo
