On 24/05/16 17:09, David Jones wrote:
Good idea. I would like to test this out so I put this on my CentOS 6 servers
(perl v5.10.1) and got this:
May 24 10:59:51.850 [30158] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin
/etc/mail/spamassassin/Concepts.pm: Type of arg 1 to push must be array (not priv
On 24.05.16 17:49, Nick Howitt wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative) and I
believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line in local.cf:
Please, don't use html mail in mailing lists.
From peacocks-mail.com I get:
Return-Path:
[6
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I would need to point it to
another iterative DNS resolver running on my box such as PowerDNS or
BIND rather than to OpenDNS or have I misunderst
On 2016-05-24 22:33, Nick Howitt wrote:
/etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1
thats all, make sure it does not change on boot
I've already got it (but the man pages says it ignores it!) but then
I've got OpenDNS after.
one more fail then, you must not use opendns
else you will see uribl_bl
Am 24.05.2016 um 22:34 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 21:30, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
will fail with uribl.com and others
Oh bunk :-(
i explained magnitude times *why* this is
Am 24.05.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
will fail with uribl.com and others
tell me something new or why do you think i did put the headline "THAT
IS A BULLSHIT SETUP ON A
Am 24.05.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 20:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it
On 24/05/2016 21:30, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
On 24/05/2016 21:28, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what
I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I would
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
will fail with uribl.com and others
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I would need to point it to
another iterative DNS resolver running on my box such as PowerDNS or
BIND rather than to OpenDNS or have I misunder
On 24/05/2016 20:53, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
*never* use a forwarind/ISP nameserver for a inbound MX
> If I understand you, I don't. I have my own domain and my mx record points to
> my dyndns FQDN
What you mentioned above is hosting your own domain's DNS to the Internet and
has nothing to do with how your ClearOS server is resolving it's
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
blocked. My mail
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
blocked. My mailserver is my gateway and only runs dnsmasq rather
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
blocked. My mailserver is my gateway and only runs dnsmasq rather than
bind and I am only a home user, so, from your link, I fall under the low
volume use
On 24/05/2016 18:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS
derivative) and
I believe it is invoked by am
Am 24.05.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative) and
I believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line in local.cf:
whitelist_from *@avivaemail.co.uk @m.avivaemail.co.uk *@tomtom.com
*@dpd.co.uk *@clearos.
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS derivative)
and I believe it is invoked by amavis-new. I have a whitelist line
in local.cf:
whitelist_from *@avivaemail.co.uk @m.avivaemail.co.uk
*@tomtom.com *@dpd.co.uk *@clearos.com *@peacocks-mail.com
>From: Paul Stead
>Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 9:55 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: SA Concepts - plugin for email semantics
>Hi guys,
>Based upon some information from others on the list I have put together
>a plugin for SA which canonicalises an email into it's basic "concepts"
Hi guys,
Based upon some information from others on the list I have put together
a plugin for SA which canonicalises an email into it's basic "concepts".
Concepts are converted to tags, which Bayes can use as tokens to further
help identify spammy/hammy characteristics
Here are some examples of
22 matches
Mail list logo
