On May 21, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 21.05.2016 um 21:16 schrieb @lbutlr:
>> On May 20, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> no it is not, look at the sanesecurity foxhole signatures
>>> http://sanesecurity.com/usage/signatures/
>>
>> I have looked at those, but there are
Am 21.05.2016 um 21:16 schrieb @lbutlr:
On May 20, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
no it is not, look at the sanesecurity foxhole signatures
http://sanesecurity.com/usage/signatures/
I have looked at those, but there are so many it’s kind of overwhelming on
where to start
4 is man
On May 20, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> no it is not, look at the sanesecurity foxhole signatures
> http://sanesecurity.com/usage/signatures/
I have looked at those, but there are so many it’s kind of overwhelming on
where to start.
--
NO. I CANNOT BE BIDDEN. I CANNOT BE FORCED. I
Am 21.05.2016 um 19:13 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Am 21.05.2016 um 06:04 schrieb Nick Edwards:
clueless newbie troll
microsofts own attempt at SPF did allow checking in "from"
On 21.05.16 12:47, Reindl Harald wrote:
ididot SPF is defined by the IETF and not by microsoft
https://en.wik
Am 21.05.2016 um 06:04 schrieb Nick Edwards:
clueless newbie troll
microsofts own attempt at SPF did allow checking in "from"
On 21.05.16 12:47, Reindl Harald wrote:
ididot SPF is defined by the IETF and not by microsoft
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_ID !=
https://en.wikipedia.org/wik
On Sat, 21 May 2016 12:28:48 -0400
"Bill Cole" wrote:
> On 20 May 2016, at 7:07, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> > Sorry for the non-easy answer. Doing it properly requires a
> > non-trivial amount of coding.
> I do not recall doing any real coding at all to get a steady trickle
> of log messages like t
On 20 May 2016, at 7:07, Dianne Skoll wrote:
Sorry for the non-easy answer. Doing it properly requires a
non-trivial
amount of coding.
I do not recall doing any real coding at all to get a steady trickle of
log messages like this (regarding mail NOT from Amazon):
May 4 01:30:05 bigsky mi
Am 21.05.2016 um 06:04 schrieb Nick Edwards:
clueless newbie troll
microsofts own attempt at SPF did allow checking in "from"
ididot SPF is defined by the IETF and not by microsoft
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_ID !=
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
On Sat, Ma
