Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread Helmut Schneider
Helmut Schneider wrote: > when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always true I > came along the following lines when debugging SA: > > Apr 15 11:44:43.211 mail /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[9991]: (09991-02) SA > dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=172.20.12.10 rdns=relay-in > helo=mail

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread Helmut Schneider
RW wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:08:15 + (UTC) > Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > RW wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:35:24 +0100 > > > RW wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:13 + (UTC) > > > > Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > when

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.04.2016 um 16:34 schrieb Helmut Schneider: Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.04.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Helmut Schneider: What does "submission" mean in this context? ESMT(S)A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTP_Authentication I'm neither using authentication nor smtp submission (TCP587)

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread Helmut Schneider
Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 15.04.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Helmut Schneider: > > What does "submission" mean in this context? > > ESMT(S)A > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTP_Authentication I'm neither using authentication nor smtp submission (TCP587).

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread RW
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:08:15 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > RW wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:35:24 +0100 > > RW wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:13 + (UTC) > > > Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > when further investigating my issue that AL

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.04.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Helmut Schneider: What does "submission" mean in this context? ESMT(S)A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTP_Authentication signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread Helmut Schneider
RW wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:35:24 +0100 > RW wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:13 + (UTC) > > Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always > > > true I came along the following lines when debugging SA: > > > >

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread RW
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:35:24 +0100 RW wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:13 + (UTC) > Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always true > > I came along the following lines when debugging SA: > > > > ... > > Apr 15 11:44:43.213 mai

Re: remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread RW
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:13 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always true I > came along the following lines when debugging SA: > > ... > Apr 15 11:44:43.213 mail /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[9991]: (09991-02) SA > dbg: received-heade

remaining relays will be considered trusted, but no longer internal

2016-04-15 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always true I came along the following lines when debugging SA: Apr 15 11:44:43.211 mail /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[9991]: (09991-02) SA dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=172.20.12.10 rdns=relay-in helo=mail2 by=mail01 ident= envfrom= intl