On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
On 29 Mar 2016, at 19:36, John Hardin wrote:
So, a message that's explicitly multipart MIME but which has only one part?
Or does it actually have multiple parts, just none are marked as
text/plain?
multipart/report; type=delivery-status. The standard MI
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
On 29 Mar 2016, at 19:36, John Hardin wrote:
Can you send me some samples?
OR: if you can submit mail through a Sendmail instance, send mail to any bad
address anywhere on any machine running any MTA, all it has to do is say '5yz
blah blah we hate yo
On 29 Mar 2016, at 19:36, John Hardin wrote:
So, a message that's explicitly multipart MIME but which has only one
part? Or does it actually have multiple parts, just none are marked as
text/plain?
multipart/report; type=delivery-status. The standard MIME delivery
status notification structu
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
This is true for 8.14.7 in FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p27 (a.k.a. "Update your damn
boxes, Bill!") and I see nothing in later release notes indicating a relevant
change in Sendmail, which is formally within spec by putting no MIME headers
in the human-readable fi
This is true for 8.14.7 in FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p27 (a.k.a. "Update your
damn boxes, Bill!") and I see nothing in later release notes indicating
a relevant change in Sendmail, which is formally within spec by putting
no MIME headers in the human-readable first part of a DSN (Seriously,
all MIME
I've enabled outgoing white listing using the TxRep plugin is there a
way to find out if outbound emails are actually being white listed? A
log somewhere... a file being updated?
--
Phil
On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>> /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
>>> 7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.s
