Am 25.02.2016 um 02:14 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
> I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd -
with > great success. In recent months, I've been receiving several
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
7.0 URIBL_BLACKContains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: leslie-bib***b.org]
That, too. Steve, you might consider boosting your local score for
URIBL_BLACK. :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
> I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd - with
> great success. In recent months, I've been receiving several spam
> messages each day that evade the fil
Am 25.02.2016 um 01:41 schrieb Steve:
On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd -
with great success. In recent months, I've been receiving several
spam messages each day that evade the filters.
On 24/02/2016 22:59, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd -
with great success. In recent months, I've been receiving several
spam messages each day that evade the filters.
Can you provide samples? (e.g. three o
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Steve wrote:
I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd - with great
success. In recent months, I've been receiving several spam messages each
day that evade the filters.
Can you provide samples? (e.g. three or four on Pastebin)
* The false positive
I've used spamassassin for many years - on Ubuntu, using amvisd - with
great success. In recent months, I've been receiving several spam
messages each day that evade the filters.
* These false-negatives conform to a handful of simple, formulaic,
textual forms - on common subjects.
* The email
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Axb wrote:
On 02/24/2016 05:02 PM, Benning, Markus wrote:
Hello,
recently i'm recieving mails which try to fool user by sending
mails with a From: like
From: "John Doe "
afaik the correct syntax would be
From: "John Doe"
That is (probably) correct syntax for
On 2016-02-24 17:20, Benning, Markus wrote:
Some MTAs only show the displayname and this is an attempt to
s/MTA/MUA/
--
https://markusbenning.de/
On 2016-02-24 17:06, Axb wrote:
afaik the correct syntax would be
From: "John Doe"
so SA is doing it right and you can probably use
/\>\" \
The address part is only spamu...@spamdomain.tld.
It is correctly parsed when retrieving it from $pms->get('From:addr').
The displayname string is "
Hello,
recently i'm recieving mails which try to fool user by sending
mails with a From: like
From: "John Doe "
While implementing a header check to detect such attempts i noticed
that SA seems to have problems parsing such addresses correctly.
When accessing the displayname with From:name th
On 02/24/2016 05:02 PM, Benning, Markus wrote:
Hello,
recently i'm recieving mails which try to fool user by sending
mails with a From: like
From: "John Doe "
While implementing a header check to detect such attempts i noticed
that SA seems to have problems parsing such addresses correctly.
12 matches
Mail list logo