On 12 Feb 2016, at 17:34, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Thanks for that suggestion. I think we might be getting somewhere. On
original machine:
#file bayes_seen
bayes_seen: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 9, native byte-order)
# file bayes_toks
bayes_toks: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 9, native byte-order)
For what it's worth - just used Redis. Redis is the only thing that's
worked reliably for me.
On 12. feb. 2016 20.06.52 Marc Perkel wrote:
# ls -l /var/spool/spamd/bayes/
Set bayes path without bayes
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/spamd/bayes/bayes_* R/W:
Remove bayes from local.cf
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On 12/02/16 21:40, Kris Deugau wrote:
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the serve
On 12/02/16 21:40, Kris Deugau wrote:
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the serve
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Kris Deugau wrote:
In general though, if you're operating at a scale where one server isn't
enough to handle your SA load, you may want to start thinking about SQL
for Bayes, which can be shared much more easily than pushing file-based
Bayes data around.
Or Redis (right?)
Am 12.02.2016 um 22:40 schrieb Kris Deugau:
In general though, if you're operating at a scale where one server isn't
enough to handle your SA load, you may want to start thinking about SQL
for Bayes, which can be shared much more easily than pushing file-based
Bayes data around
no, that creat
Am 12.02.2016 um 22:36 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 20:58 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I'm on Slackware without selinux. I'm not even convinced it is a
permission problem at all. If I restrict the permissions of the files
on purpose, it actually reports:
In that case ignor
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
>> On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>>
>>> As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
>>> several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
>>> database
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 20:58 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> I'm on Slackware without selinux. I'm not even convinced it is a
> permission problem at all. If I restrict the permissions of the files
> on purpose, it actually reports:
>
In that case ignore my last post, which assumed it was an SElin
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 15:49 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 2/12/2016 3:45 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> > On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
> > > On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> > >
> > > > As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes
> > > > d
On 12/02/16 20:49, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 2/12/2016 3:45 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes
databases on
several different servers running
On 2/12/2016 3:45 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes
databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
d
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
database is not accepted.
Are the servers all t
Am 12.02.2016 um 21:31 schrieb Antony Stone:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
database is not accepted.
Are the serv
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
> several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
> database is not accepted.
Are the servers all the same distro, release and version?
On 12/02/16 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.02.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Marc Perkel:
Any chance that the parent directory structure doesn't have enough
permissions?
The error message says it can't access it so there's your clue. Since
the files themselves seem to have good permissions I would
Am 12.02.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Marc Perkel:
Any chance that the parent directory structure doesn't have enough
permissions?
The error message says it can't access it so there's your clue. Since
the files themselves seem to have good permissions I would look at the
directories.
see previous m
Any chance that the parent directory structure doesn't have enough
permissions?
The error message says it can't access it so there's your clue. Since
the files themselves seem to have good permissions I would look at the
directories.
On 02/12/16 08:29, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice fr
On 12/02/16 16:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.02.2016 um 17:29 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
database is not accepted. I re-transferred them several times
On 12/02/16 16:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.02.2016 um 17:29 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
database is not accepted. I re-transferred them several times
Am 12.02.2016 um 17:29 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
database is not accepted. I re-transferred them several times over ssh,
to make sure they were not cor
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
# ls -l /var/spool/spamd/bayes/
total 5912
-rw-rw-rw- 1 spamd spamd 1310720 2016-02-09 08:42 bayes_seen
-rw-rw-rw- 1 spamd spamd 4739072 2016-02-09 08:43 bayes_toks
When I try to learn a new message on the receiving server (where I moved the
bayes fi
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
database is not accepted. I re-transferred them several times over ssh,
to make sure they were not corrupted. The database files are in the
correct lo
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 07:30 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Yeah - unless you write your own SA module using DNS is the quick
> easy solution.
>
If Alex already has a set of scripts that populate and maintain the
database that he's happy with, then the quick and easy way may be to
make a custom SA mo
On Feb 12, 2016, at 5:39 AM, Alex
mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I've been cycling URLs and IPs through a mariadb
database gathered from incoming mail on a honeypot I've created.
Surprising how many are received ahead of spamhaus/barracuda.
I'm looking for ideas
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 15:06 +, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:05:26 +
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > Feb 7 00:29:22 zoogz spamd[9347]: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
> > shutting down
> > Feb 7 00:29:22 zoogz spamd[9347]: spamd: cannot send SIGINT to
> > child
> > process [9352]: N
On 02/12/16 05:39, Alex wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I've been cycling URLs and IPs through a mariadb
database gathered from incoming mail on a honeypot I've created.
Surprising how many are received ahead of spamhaus/barracuda.
I'm looking for ideas on how to now make this information availa
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:05:26 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 19:09 +, RW wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:02:13 +
> > Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >
> > > Every so often I see the following in my nightly logwatch rep
> > >
> > > Child-related errors
> > > spamd: c
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 08:39 -0500, Alex wrote:
> Is it possible for spamassassin to query a database directly?
>
Yes, with a plugin.
I've been doing the opposite for some years now: I archive all my
outgoing mail and most of my non-spam incoming mail in a Postgres
database and use this as a whit
>
>From: Alex
>For some time now I've been cycling URLs and IPs through a mariadb
>database gathered from incoming mail on a honeypot I've created.
>Surprising how many are received ahead of spamhaus/barracuda.
Major RBLs like that keep up with lots of da
On 02/12/2016 02:39 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I've been cycling URLs and IPs through a mariadb
database gathered from incoming mail on a honeypot I've created.
Surprising how many are received ahead of spamhaus/barracuda.
I'm looking for ideas on how to now make this information av
Hi,
For some time now I've been cycling URLs and IPs through a mariadb
database gathered from incoming mail on a honeypot I've created.
Surprising how many are received ahead of spamhaus/barracuda.
I'm looking for ideas on how to now make this information available to
spamassassin on my producti
Is this a setting somewhere that I should have in place?
Feb 12 09:09:30.509 [73122] dbg: config: fixed relative path:
/opt/local/var/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/10_default_prefs.cf
Feb 12 09:09:30.509 [73122] dbg: config: using
"/opt/local/var/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_sp
Yes well, back again.
sa-update is running, and supposedly updating rules.
spam assassin -D —lint still shows a long list… however, no longer shows that
first one from a while back…
Feb 12 09:09:30.977 [73122] dbg: config: warning: no description set for
HK_SCAM_N2
Feb 12 09:09:30.977 [73122]
35 matches
Mail list logo
