On 16/07/2015 19:58, Benning, Markus wrote:
> Hi Patrik,
>
> i just pushed Version 1.002 to github and CPAN:
>
> --
> The following new features have been added:
>
> - New option: timing_redis_password allows to specifiy a redis password
Sorry to reply to an old thread, but is it possible fo
On 2016-02-04 18:30, Alan Hodgson wrote:
SPF strict outright breaks mail forwarding, unless the forwarder
rewrites the
envelope sender.
nope, i want NOT to use my envelope sender from apache org, wake up
Am 04.02.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
please dont reply since i ignore your ignorances
then SHUT UP if you don't want a response!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2016-02-04 16:36, Reindl Harald wrote:
wait i tell you something (for you) new: DMARC and mailing-lists is a
awful topic - what do you think would have happened with you mail to
the list if your domain would enforce DMARC and my MX reject mails
violating the policy?
mailllist that breaks dk
On 2016-02-04 11:04, Antony Stone wrote:
From: Antony Stone
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Um, that's not a forged From address. I own the domain source.it and
spamassassin.open.source.it is a valid subdomain of that.
https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/spamassassin.open.source.it
https://d
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 08:05:59 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> in context of "DKIM and DMARC are the present and near future" how do
> you imaine that to work if you have no clue who is sending on behalf of
> yours?
>
Well you obviously have something emotionally invested in SPF.
But anyways
Am 04.02.2016 um 20:00 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 04.02.2016 um 19:51 schrieb Alan Hodgson:
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 07:41:44 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
which people don't know this?
admins?
don't maintain services then!
users?
just use the SMTP server your mailprovider tells you and no ot
Am 04.02.2016 um 19:51 schrieb Alan Hodgson:
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 07:41:44 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
which people don't know this?
admins?
don't maintain services then!
users?
just use the SMTP server your mailprovider tells you and no other one
and for smtp-admins: just don't accept
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 07:41:44 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> which people don't know this?
> admins?
> don't maintain services then!
>
> users?
>
> just use the SMTP server your mailprovider tells you and no other one
> and for smtp-admins: just don't accept enevlope senders for which you
>
Am 04.02.2016 um 19:17 schrieb David Jones:
Google is telling all of their mail customers to add DMARC DNS records to block
spoofing of their own domains
before Google ist telling somebody something they should better learn
the difference between "~" and "-" in a SPF record to make gmail.com
>> Google is telling all of their mail customers to add DMARC DNS records to
>> block
>> spoofing of their own domains
>before Google ist telling somebody something they should better learn
>the difference between "~" and "-" in a SPF record to make gmail.com at
>least on envelope-level spoofing
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
DMARC is a combination of SPF and DKIM plus From: header spoofing check.
You must get SPF and DKIM setup before adding the '_dmarc' DNS record for
the sending domain
tell me something new
wait i tell you something (for you) new: DMARC and mailing-lists
Am 04.02.2016 um 18:30 schrieb Alan Hodgson:
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 06:06:14 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
before Google ist telling somebody something they should better learn
the difference between "~" and "-" in a SPF record to make gmail.com at
least on envelope-level spoofing protected
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 04:36:14 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> wait i tell you something (for you) new: DMARC and mailing-lists is a
> awful topic - what do you think would have happened with you mail to the
> list if your domain would enforce DMARC and my MX reject mails violating
> the poli
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 06:06:14 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> before Google ist telling somebody something they should better learn
> the difference between "~" and "-" in a SPF record to make gmail.com at
> least on envelope-level spoofing protected
>
> i high percentage of spam here would no
Am 04.02.2016 um 17:38 schrieb David Jones:
* you did not provide a hint to the list-problem
* to "solve" the OP's problem DMARC is not needed
Mail admins need to get familiar with DMARC because major ISPs have begun
to take this seriously in the past year and are starting to reject or put int
>* you did not provide a hint to the list-problem
>* to "solve" the OP's problem DMARC is not needed
Mail admins need to get familiar with DMARC because major ISPs have begun
to take this seriously in the past year and are starting to reject or put into
spam
folders when this is setup incorrectly
Am 04.02.2016 um 16:49 schrieb David Jones:
DMARC is a combination of SPF and DKIM plus From: header spoofing check.
You must get SPF and DKIM setup before adding the '_dmarc' DNS record for
the sending domain
tell me something new
This email was not just for you. If you already knew this
>> DMARC is a combination of SPF and DKIM plus From: header spoofing check.
>> You must get SPF and DKIM setup before adding the '_dmarc' DNS record for
>> the sending domain
>tell me something new
This email was not just for you. If you already knew this, then ignore it.
>wait i tell you some
Am 04.02.2016 um 16:20 schrieb David Jones:
Are you using DKIM / SPF for your domain? I mean, why do you accept
email apparently from your own domain when it does not come from one of
your authorised servers?
because the From header has nothing to do with the envelope sender and
so not with
Are you using DKIM / SPF for your domain? I mean, why do you accept
email apparently from your own domain when it does not come from one of
your authorised servers?
>>>
>>> because the From header has nothing to do with the envelope sender and
>>> so not with SPF and spoofing protec
Am 04.02.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Antony Stone:
On Thursday 04 February 2016 at 10:58:42, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.02.2016 um 10:55 schrieb Antony Stone:
On Thursday 04 February 2016 at 10:47:18, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
1. Our users received some spam emails which is showing our domain em
On Thursday 04 February 2016 at 10:58:42, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 04.02.2016 um 10:55 schrieb Antony Stone:
> > On Thursday 04 February 2016 at 10:47:18, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
> >> 1. Our users received some spam emails which is showing our domain email
> >> account in From address.
> >
>
Am 04.02.2016 um 10:55 schrieb Antony Stone:
On Thursday 04 February 2016 at 10:47:18, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
1. Our users received some spam emails which is showing our domain email
account in From address.
Nothing unusual in that - forged From addresses have been common for many
years
On Thursday 04 February 2016 at 10:47:18, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
> 1. Our users received some spam emails which is showing our domain email
> account in From address.
Nothing unusual in that - forged From addresses have been common for many
years.
> But those email account don't have mailbo
Hi friends,
I need some help from you. could you go through my below issue and help me
to fix .
1. Our users received some spam emails which is showing our domain email
account in From address.
But those email account don't have mailbox in my server.
2. Second thing is some emails send spam email
26 matches
Mail list logo
