On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
However the main cause for FPs seems to me internal mail (reporting
scripts sending mail to sysadmin or BI people) which is semi-whitelisted
anyway.
That should only happen if their SA is misconfigured: it checks *external*
relays.
Regardless, I've r
Am 26.01.2016 um 11:20 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
If you can't investigate, you either need to put your trust in bayes to
compensate, or just drop the score. Whining because the rule does not
match *your* type of mail does not make sense
it is not *my type of mail*
it's the type of mail of differ
On 26-01-16 10:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
>> On 25-01-16 16:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 25.01.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
> not worth an argument when it's simply wrong an
Am 26.01.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 25-01-16 16:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.01.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
not worth an argument when it's simply wrong and hits mostly clear ham
and is broken by definition looking at *
On 25-01-16 16:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.01.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>> On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> not worth an argument when it's simply wrong and hits mostly clear ham
>>> and is broken by definition looking at *random* headers?
>>>
>>> cat maillo
