On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, Alex wrote:
As John said, masschecks is being starved. How far off is it from
being sufficiently populated?
You can always visit the masscheck home page and hover over the stats to
see the latest submitted corpus size. Last run was 102k spam, 203k ham.
The minimum to pub
Hi,
>> I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
>> weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
>
> i noticed that long ago - look in the list archives also for the responses
Yes, I recall, but still nothing is being done to make a major
component of
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, Alex wrote:
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
The masscheck spam corpus has been starved. Possibly due to the holidays,
though I can't say for sure.
This is a significant
Am 16.01.2016 um 19:38 schrieb Alex:
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
i noticed that long ago - look in the list archives also for the responses
This is a significant part of what makes spama
Alex skrev den 2016-01-16 19:38:
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
more masscheckers wont hurt anyone
This is a significant part of what makes spamassassin so great. Is
there no one else that h
Hi,
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
This is a significant part of what makes spamassassin so great. Is
there no one else that has a regular spam/ham stream that can
contribute?
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:07:36 +0300
? wrote:
> No, spamd is running as user "root", so I don't have the "-u" key
> anywhere in the smapd configs. I'm sorry for not making this clear
> enough.
>
> What I meant to say is that when I send or receive a message through
> my Exim (on the r
Good day!
Thanks for your reply.
No, spamd is running as user "root", so I don't have the "-u" key anywhere
in the smapd configs. I'm sorry for not making this clear enough.
What I meant to say is that when I send or receive a message through my
Exim (on the remote host) it passes the message to
