On December 13, 2015 1:16:17 AM Marc Perkel
wrote:
Because I'd have to upgrade 50 servers for consistency and if I do that
I'll probably try something other than centos.
okay, it just not how i would solve +1 server farms in gentoo, here i would
emerge --buildpkgonly on master, and then eme
On 12/12/15 15:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On December 12, 2015 5:49:27 PM Marc Perkel
wrote:
I can put redis in thew yum exception list
so much precompiled problems, why not upgrade to centos 7 ?
Because I'd have to upgrade 50 servers for consistency and if I do that
I'll probably try
Am 13.12.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On December 12, 2015 5:49:27 PM Marc Perkel
wrote:
I can put redis in thew yum exception list
so much precompiled problems
blablub nonsense as usual
why not upgrade to centos 7 ?
because it's the purpose of a LTS not have major updates f
On December 12, 2015 8:33:28 PM Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I guess I must be using the default settings - as I don't think I've
configured anything in particular for AWL
change default /16 cidr to new default /24 for ipv4, for ipv6 use /64, if
you like to track on /32 for ipv4 then each ipv4 wil
On December 12, 2015 5:49:27 PM Marc Perkel
wrote:
I can put redis in thew yum exception list
so much precompiled problems, why not upgrade to centos 7 ?
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/12/15 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
> following report:
>
> -0.4 AWLAWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation
Am 12.12.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Axb:
On 12/12/2015 05:13 PM, RW wrote:
The number of tokens depends on how many you train, not on how many you
scan.
Obvious...
via autolearn my Bayes gets a constant feed of +500k "forced learn"
spams/day.
Works for me to expire those after 3 or 7 days, depen
On 12/12/15 13:06, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Sebastian Arcus skrev den 2015-12-12 12:51:
Why
would AWL now tilt things heavily towards ham, after the message has
just been learned as spam?
its how AWL works
It seems to be making things worse instead
of better. Unless I am misunderstanding what
On 12/12/15 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
following report:
-0.4 AWLAWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation
of From: address
After learning the messages as spam
On 12/12/2015 05:13 PM, RW wrote:
The number of tokens depends on how many you train, not on how many you
scan.
Obvious...
via autolearn my Bayes gets a constant feed of +500k "forced learn"
spams/day.
Works for me to expire those after 3 or 7 days, depending on the trap feed.
Production tra
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the following
report:
-0.4 AWLAWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
address
After learning the messages as spam into bayes with sa-learn, I get the
fol
Am 12.12.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Marc Perkel:
On 12/12/15 09:36, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 08:49 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I can put redis in thew yum exception list
Or, you can install your self-built version in /usr/local/bin and
adjust $PATH so it preceeds /usr and /usr
On 12/12/15 09:36, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 08:49 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I can put redis in thew yum exception list
Or, you can install your self-built version in /usr/local/bin and
adjust $PATH so it preceeds /usr and /usr/bin. This will protect your
version from yum
On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 08:49 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I can put redis in thew yum exception list
>
Or, you can install your self-built version in /usr/local/bin and
adjust $PATH so it preceeds /usr and /usr/bin. This will protect your
version from yum or dnf updates.
Then keep an eye on subse
Am 12.12.2015 um 18:24 schrieb Marc Perkel:
On 12/12/15 02:38, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2015 12:28 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
redis_version:2.4.10
You're using an ancient Redis version...
SA makes use of LUA support which was added in 2.6.0
You definitely need to upgrde to 3.x and you'll probabl
On 12/12/15 02:38, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2015 12:28 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
redis_version:2.4.10
You're using an ancient Redis version...
SA makes use of LUA support which was added in 2.6.0
You definitely need to upgrde to 3.x and you'll probably need to nuke
your DB dump before the upgrad
sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 69569 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 88747 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000
On 12/12/15 08:47, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.12.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Marc Perkel:
On 12/12/15 02:38, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2015 12:28 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
redis_version:2.4.10
You're using an ancient Redis version...
SA makes use of LUA support which was added in 2.6.0
You definitely
On 12/12/15 08:47, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.12.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Marc Perkel:
On 12/12/15 02:38, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2015 12:28 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
redis_version:2.4.10
You're using an ancient Redis version...
SA makes use of LUA support which was added in 2.6.0
You definitely
Am 12.12.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Marc Perkel:
On 12/12/15 02:38, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2015 12:28 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
redis_version:2.4.10
You're using an ancient Redis version...
SA makes use of LUA support which was added in 2.6.0
You definitely need to upgrde to 3.x and you'll probably
On 12/12/15 02:38, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2015 12:28 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
redis_version:2.4.10
You're using an ancient Redis version...
SA makes use of LUA support which was added in 2.6.0
You definitely need to upgrde to 3.x and you'll probably need to nuke
your DB dump before the upgrad
Am 12.12.2015 um 17:13 schrieb RW:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 13:29:40 +0100
Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2015 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I hate stale data... that's all
But you do keep stale data in the retained tokens, what you are getting
rid of is the contribution from old mails that's least lik
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 13:29:40 +0100
Axb wrote:
> On 12/12/2015 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> I hate stale data... that's all
But you do keep stale data in the retained tokens, what you are getting
rid of is the contribution from old mails that's least likely to make a
difference to any
Sebastian Arcus skrev den 2015-12-12 12:51:
Why
would AWL now tilt things heavily towards ham, after the message has
just been learned as spam?
its how AWL works
It seems to be making things worse instead
of better. Unless I am misunderstanding what AWL is supposed to be
doing?
what are yo
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
following report:
Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender
On 12/12/2015 02:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.12.2015 um 20:58 schrieb Axb:
I hate stale data... that's all
how can bayes data be stale?
a spam message is a spam message now, tomorrow and next year
the same especially for ham
over time...
header patterns change
url patterns change
ht
On December 12, 2015 9:53:33 AM Matthias Apitz wrote:
Before digging into the creation process for the package, I wanted to
ask if there could be some other reason. Thanks
sa-compile, just dont add it to ports
make a badh with
sa-update
sa-compile
run it daily, and remember start glue that
You need to look at sa-compile.
Regards,
KAM
On December 12, 2015 3:53:04 AM EST, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>While looking after some other problem in /var/log/maillog, I found
>lines like this:
>
>Dec 12 09:41:29 c720-r285885-amd64 spamd[2253]: Can't locate
>Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledReg
On 12/12/2015 12:28 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
redis_version:2.4.10
You're using an ancient Redis version...
SA makes use of LUA support which was added in 2.6.0
You definitely need to upgrde to 3.x and you'll probably need to nuke
your DB dump before the upgrade...
Hello,
While looking after some other problem in /var/log/maillog, I found
lines like this:
Dec 12 09:41:29 c720-r285885-amd64 spamd[2253]: Can't locate
Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC (you may need to
install the Mail::SpamAssassin::CompiledRegexps::body_0 module) (@INC
cont
30 matches
Mail list logo
