DNS lookups fail with SpamAssassin since Net::DNS 1.03

2015-11-12 Thread Mark Martinec
Net::DNS 1.03 breaks compatibility with SpamAssassin: DNS lookups no longer work, and warnings like the following pop up: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "handles" via package "IO::Socket::IP" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm line 735. There is a CPAN

Re: How to configure FOO=-1.0 in X-Spam-Status ?

2015-11-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2015-11-12 08:20, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 11/12/2015 6:31 AM, Christian Jaeger wrote: Hi I'm seeing X-Spam-Status headers from some other installation come with =$x appended to the individual matches, which evidently helps figuring out why a mail is being classified the way it is. I've spent

Re: How to configure FOO=-1.0 in X-Spam-Status ?

2015-11-12 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 11/12/2015 6:31 AM, Christian Jaeger wrote: Hi I'm seeing X-Spam-Status headers from some other installation come with =$x appended to the individual matches, which evidently helps figuring out why a mail is being classified the way it is. I've spent more than an hour on googling and rtfm but

Re: Debian jessie - new setup, missing data directory

2015-11-12 Thread Phil Reynolds
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:45:03 + Phil Reynolds wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 13:23:04 + > Phil Reynolds wrote: > > > I have recently transferred all of my email system to a new machine, > > but spamassassin is not yet fully functional. > > > > It seems that it is trying to use /var/mail/.s

Re: How to configure FOO=-1.0 in X-Spam-Status ?

2015-11-12 Thread Axb
On 11/12/2015 12:31 PM, Christian Jaeger wrote: Hi I'm seeing X-Spam-Status headers from some other installation come with =$x appended to the individual matches, which evidently helps figuring out why a mail is being classified the way it is. I've spent more than an hour on googling and rtfm bu

How to configure FOO=-1.0 in X-Spam-Status ?

2015-11-12 Thread Christian Jaeger
Hi I'm seeing X-Spam-Status headers from some other installation come with =$x appended to the individual matches, which evidently helps figuring out why a mail is being classified the way it is. I've spent more than an hour on googling and rtfm but couldn't figure it out. Also, grep does not turn