After retraining and setting spam assassin for wide site all looks good.
Spam gets bayes99 and non spam is bayes00.
So far i did not get any spam.
Thank you all for your help.
>>
>>
>> Am 31.10.2015 um 16:06 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
>>> So after initial learning it looks better now. (BAYES_50)
>
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Joe Quinn wrote:
On 11/2/2015 12:00 PM, Richard Mealing wrote:
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
This would be an excellent place, yes.
Additionally: make sure you take a look at the rules sandboxes in SVN.
There may already be a ru
On 11/2/2015 12:00 PM, Richard Mealing wrote:
Hi there,
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
I'm new here..
Thanks,
Rich
This would be an excellent place, yes. The more technical discussion for
things like bugs in eval rules will generally happen in dev@ bu
On 11/2/2015 12:00 PM, Richard Mealing wrote:
Hi there,
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
I’m new here..
Thanks,
Rich
Sure though if you are writing rules and want feedback, dev@ might be a
better list!
Hi there,
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
I'm new here..
Thanks,
Rich
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 07:38:57 -0800
Shaheen Bakhtiar wrote:
> Well? I?m glad I?m on this mailing list :P
>
> I did the same thing, running sa-learn ?spam /spamfolder as root, and
> was pondering this very issue.
>
> I understand the logic behind why it shouldn?t be run as root, the
> problem is o
On 11/2/2015 11:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.11.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and why did he change spamd login permisson when using sa-learn :(
because *as he explained* the service user has /sbin/nologin as shell
and so "su - username" won't work until you change that or as i
Am 02.11.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and why did he change spamd login permisson when using sa-learn :(
because *as he explained* the service user has /sbin/nologin as shell
and so "su - username" won't work until you change that or as i
explained create a user with a shell traini
On 11/02/2015 05:21 PM, Shaheen Bakhtiar wrote:
Ah! I see… that makes sense.. but spamc reads one mail at a time, is there way
(other than writing a script) to have it read a folder full of emails?
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/sa-learn.txt
and bookmark
http://spamassassin.apa
Ah! I see… that makes sense.. but spamc reads one mail at a time, is there way
(other than writing a script) to have it read a folder full of emails?
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 8:02 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Axb skrev den 2015-11-02 16:42:
>> On 11/02/2015 04:38 PM, Shaheen Bakhtiar wrote:
>>> W
Am 02.11.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Axb:
On 11/02/2015 04:38 PM, Shaheen Bakhtiar wrote:
Well… I’m glad I’m on this mailing list :P
I did the same thing, running sa-learn —spam /spamfolder as root, and
was pondering this very issue.
I understand the logic behind why it shouldn’t be run as root, t
Axb skrev den 2015-11-02 16:42:
On 11/02/2015 04:38 PM, Shaheen Bakhtiar wrote:
Well… I’m glad I’m on this mailing list :P
I did the same thing, running sa-learn —spam /spamfolder as root, and
was pondering this very issue.
I understand the logic behind why it shouldn’t be run as root, the
pro
On 11/02/2015 04:38 PM, Shaheen Bakhtiar wrote:
Well… I’m glad I’m on this mailing list :P
I did the same thing, running sa-learn —spam /spamfolder as root, and
was pondering this very issue.
I understand the logic behind why it shouldn’t be run as root, the
problem is on FC 22 the spamd user h
Well… I’m glad I’m on this mailing list :P
I did the same thing, running sa-learn —spam /spamfolder as root, and was
pondering this very issue.
I understand the logic behind why it shouldn’t be run as root, the problem is
on FC 22 the spamd user has /sbin/nologin as the shell in /etc/passwd. W
14 matches
Mail list logo
