Is there a way to learn what bayes learned so far?
> On Oct 27, 2015, at 4:35 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>>
>> example mail sa headers:
>
> Is this from a spam?
>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
>> ip-10-254-37
yes there might be few emails there that were legitimate
i cleaned it but i did not have time to do it property
are not
net/RBL/DNSBL tests
enabled by default?
i need to review the documentation and see why it does not work
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> try this
>> https:
On 27 Oct 2015, at 16:02, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
SO i setup the dns server.
Can i force spam assassin to use localhost for dns or I must
reconfigure
the host?
You can just change SA, but you should change the whole host to use it
if your MTA is running there as well. the MTA is probably d
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
try this
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ngmaryggdelecjq/INBOX.spam?dl=0
it is mbox file with like 1000 spam messages that are not recognized as spam
Are you -sure- all those messages are spam?
One of them was a personal FaceBook update message.
If you
try this
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ngmaryggdelecjq/INBOX.spam?dl=0
it is mbox file with like 1000 spam messages that are not recognized as spam
> On 28/10/2015 07:38, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>> i uploaded my inbox with all spam that does not get filtered
>>
>> https://mega.nz/#!IRhlyQLL
>>
>
> 1
On 10/27/15 14:16, David Jones wrote:
Also - add a highest numbers MX record tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
This will help tune our list to your spam and also get rid of a lot od it.
Is this safe to use with greylisting on the lower MX records? I see you
temp fail (4xx) all email so it should b
On 28/10/2015 07:38, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
i uploaded my inbox with all spam that does not get filtered
https://mega.nz/#!IRhlyQLL
1/ that site is slo
2/ you need a decryption key to access it
3/ try pastebin instead
--
If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to li
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
example mail sa headers:
Is this from a spam?
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
ip-10-254-37-89.us-west-2.compute.internal
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
j...@lexoncom.com skrev den 2015-10-27 21:33:
thx, yes i did that but found old doc and that option was not
available:
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
this is why i suggest to check local docs first, if not found local,
check atleast to diff queuerie
j...@lexoncom.com skrev den 2015-10-27 21:02:
SO i setup the dns server.
Can i force spam assassin to use localhost for dns or I must
reconfigure
the host?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
see dns server
# local.cf
dns_server 127.0.0.1
>> Also - add a highest numbers MX record tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
>>
>> This will help tune our list to your spam and also get rid of a lot od it.
>>
Is this safe to use with greylisting on the lower MX records? I see you
temp fail (4xx) all email so it should be safe. Didn't see anything abo
thx, yes i did that but found old doc and that option was not available:
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
>
> Am 27.10.2015 um 21:02 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
>> SO i setup the dns server.
>> Can i force spam assassin to use localhost for dns or I must re
Yes - add to local.cf
As the highest numbered MX record tarbaby,junkemailfilter.com usually
only sees virus bots. It never accepts email and refuses with a 4xx
error in case something legit hits it. So we never see your email.
It also doesn't blacklist good email. The sender has to commit sev
Am 27.10.2015 um 21:02 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
SO i setup the dns server.
Can i force spam assassin to use localhost for dns or I must reconfigure
the host?
i recommend to read at least basic docs
google "spamassassin dns" leads to
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAss
SO i setup the dns server.
Can i force spam assassin to use localhost for dns or I must reconfigure
the host?
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
>>
>> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZ
can you explain how this works?
Do i add this to spam local.cf file?
would not
> Also - add a highest numbers MX record tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
allow your servers to see my emails?
thx
> You can use my black and white lists. It should help.
>
> header __RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA
> eval:check_rbl('H
Am 27.10.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
it does not explain why should it cause problems for HELO SPF. as I have
already noted, using CNAME for HELO violates SMTP RFC, so there's
technically no reason to follow CNAME expecially in these cases
that is nonsense
the goal of HELO
Am 27.10.2015 um 20:31 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
I understand now.
sa-learn --ham --no-rebuild ham_directory
sa-learn --spam --no-rebuild spam_directory
sa-learn --rebuild
so would the best practice to be move spam to spam folder and learn as spam
and learn all other folders as ham and then r
I understand now.
sa-learn --ham --no-rebuild ham_directory
sa-learn --spam --no-rebuild spam_directory
sa-learn --rebuild
so would the best practice to be move spam to spam folder and learn as spam
and learn all other folders as ham and then rebuild.
The inbox would never be scanned as it might h
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,SPF_HELO_PASS,
SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version
Am 27.10.2015 um 20:23 schrieb Marc Perkel:
Also - add a highest numbers MX record tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
This will help tune our list to your spam and also get rid of a lot od it
how do you distinct fools like facebook at the moment always trying
first the backup-MX (which is here a po
You can use my black and white lists. It should help.
header __RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA
eval:check_rbl('HOSTKARMA-lastexternal','hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com.')
describe __RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA Sender listed in JunkEmailFilter
tflags __RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA net
header RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W eval:check_rbl_sub(
Am 27.10.2015 um 20:19 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
I dont use any ham training
then you can't expect bayes to work at all because how do you expect the
bayes filter to know the *difference* of ham and spam signs?
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesFaq
signature.asc
Description: Op
On 26.10.15 13:09, Django [BOfH] wrote:
Hello list, dear Marc!
correction: Helo spamassassn-users list - it has nothing to do with
attachment or virus scanning.
you should have contacted amavisd-new list
http://lists.amavis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amavis-users
So I tried to understand,
I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this command:
sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/username/mail/foldername
"is the bayes-db of this user *realy* used at scan time"
how do i check that?
I use the procemail to pass all mail through spam assassin.
I use default ubuntu setup wi
On 22.10.15 00:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
otherwise you would not be able to set a SPF-record for your CNAMES
and "reject_unknown_sender_domain" won't hit for a forged subdomain
because it exists - so SPF *must* work for CNAMES or the whole
intention for HELO SPF would not work
Am 22.10.2015 um
On 10/27/2015 06:50 PM, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
I use spam assassin with razors on ubuntu server.
In recent months i started to get tons of spam.
Spam assassin does not catch it and scores are very low.
Are those emails fabricated so well that they look like legitimate? Can i
do something to ca
Am 27.10.2015 um 18:50 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
I use spam assassin with razors on ubuntu server.
In recent months i started to get tons of spam.
Spam assassin does not catch it and scores are very low.
Are those emails fabricated so well that they look like legitimate? Can i
do something to
I use spam assassin with razors on ubuntu server.
In recent months i started to get tons of spam.
Spam assassin does not catch it and scores are very low.
Are those emails fabricated so well that they look like legitimate? Can i
do something to catch those as spam?
I moved them all to one folder
29 matches
Mail list logo